The Package | 73 Stories

The invisible minority in India wants basic rights and dignity, not a softer or a politer name
Premium

Jargon like diversity and inclusion, while important in the conversation about disability rights, also run the risk of remaining mere catchphrases with a shelf life.   

December 01, 2022 09:56 pm | Updated December 04, 2022 02:05 pm IST - Bengaluru

The United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy and disability rights activists advocate the widely accepted “people-first” language for referring to persons with disabilities.

The United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy and disability rights activists advocate the widely accepted “people-first” language for referring to persons with disabilities. | Photo Credit: K. MURALI KUMAR

When Gitanjali Govindarajan, educator and Director of Snehadhara, a city-based NGO, took a group of people with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDDs) on a visit to the Gollahalli railway station last month, little did she know the group would not only be denied entry, but would also be threatened with physical harm by officials at the station.

The episode, captured on video by the NGO, soon went viral, highlighting the discrimination that persons with disabilities (PwDs) continue to face as a result of lack of sensitivity and awareness. It also underscored the importance of language while engaging with people from marginalised communities.

“When we talk of communities that are underrepresented or discriminated against, language plays a key role. Bracketing children with IDDs under the term “mental retardation” (also an inappropriate term) may not be a fair representation because we are talking about ‘diverse learning groups’. More importantly, we must remember they are ultimately just children who learn differently,” says Dr. Govindarajan.

‘People-first’ language

Arman Ali, Executive Director, National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (NCPEDP) agrees that we must do away with terms like ‘retarded’, ‘crippled’ or ‘wheelchair-bound’. “A wheelchair is very enabling and I use one myself. If you take that away from me, it causes a lot of trauma navigating a highly inaccessible country like India,” he says.

The United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy agrees with disability rights activists in advocating the widely accepted “people-first” language while referring to PwDs. People-first language emphasises the person, not the disability, such as a person with dwarfism, person with autism, person with paraplegia. Not a dwarf, an autistic or a paraplegic.

Terminologies, Mr. Ali believes, also matters for an accurate statement of facts. For instance, the term “persons with disabilities” is well-accepted in India and is even encoded in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. However, in countries like the UK, “disabled people” is a more preferred term as it foregrounds the role of society in disabling people.

“In the Western world, disability is often defined as barriers existing in society and infrastructure that prevent full inclusion of a person. When you say “disabled person”, you are accepting that society has failed and that’s why a person is disabled,” explains Nipun Malhotra, CEO of Nipman Foundation that focuses on health and advocacy for PwDs.  

Moving beyond labels and euphemisms

Language, however, is also limiting when it comes to human connections; not to mention, constantly changing. Therefore, even as we adopt a rights-based language when referring to PwDs, activists wonder if we can focus on the primary issues concerning the community without getting carried away by “positive” labels and euphemisms.

The RPwD Act, 2016, identifies 18 different types of disabilities. “Addressing someone as specially abled, differently abled or exceptionally abled does not improve their lives. According to government data, 75% students with disability drop out of school in India. If I am being denied a fundamental right on the basis of identity, how does the right terminology enable me?” asks Mr. Ali. 

Considering the acute lack of awareness about disability in India, language can also create stereotypes. In 2016, upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s suggestion, the Hindi word for PwDs was changed from Viklang (one with non-functional body parts) to Divyang (one with a divine body part or divine power), which disability rights activists say puts undue pressure on PwDs to use their will power to do activities of daily living.

As an invisible minority in India, what PwDs need is not a softer or a politer name. They want basic rights and dignity without stereotyping them as superheroes, the sick or the godsent, they say.

“The bigger question is not what we call them but how we treat them based on what they are called. Are labels in fact strengthening the othering? The minute you put labels, it means ‘You and I are different’,” says Dr. Gitanjali taking strong exception to such romanticised terminology.   

Acute lack of awareness, sensitivity 

Jargon like diversity and inclusion, while important in the conversation about disability rights, also run the risk or remaining mere catchphrases with a shelf life.   

As a social entrepreneur helping public and private sector organisations become more inclusive of PwDs, Mr. Malhotra developed the 3As (Attitudes, Accessibility, Affordability) framework. “People asked me why I put attitude before accessibility. Accessibility is visible but it is driven by attitudes. Until people internalise that PwDs are just like them, change will not happen,” he says.

To build awareness and empathy, activists suggest introducing disability sensitisation education at school level to normalise the idea of disability from a young age. 

Disability is a life span approach from ages 0-100, Mr. Ali observes, suggesting the need to create a mission mode for awareness along the lines of government campaigns like Swacch Bharat Abhiyaan and Beti Bachao Beti Padhao.

“People with disabilities are people, too, and access, education and employment are something everyone needs. The needs are same, just the means are different,” he says.

Language matters

What to avoid What to say
Disabled, differently-abled/challenged, specially-abled/challengedPerson with disabilities or disabled person
Mentally challenged, mentally retardedPerson with intellectual and developmental disabilities
SpasticPerson with cerebral palsy
AutisticPerson with autism spectrum disorder
Handicapped, crippled, invalidDisabled person, person with physical disability
The blind, visually challengedPerson with visual impairment; blind people; partially-sighted people
The deaf, deaf and dumbPerson with a hearing impairment, deaf person or deaf-mute
Mental patient, insane, madPerson with a mental health condition
Dwarf, midgetPerson with dwarfism, restricted growth or short stature
Abled-bodied, normalNon-disabled, average, typical, neurotypical
Things to remember
Use person-first language
Allow the disabled person to self-identify
Speak directly to a disabled person, even if they have an interpreter or companion with them
Use a normal tone of voice, don’t patronise or talk down
Do not use ableist language like lame excuse, turn a blind eye to, blind drunk, that’s plain crazy, not a leg to stand on, deaf to our pleas etc
Don’t be too politically correct or super-sensitive to the language and fail to engage with the real issues

Top News Today

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.