SC to hear Cauvery case on April 9

Centre’s application to be heard along with contempt petition by Tamil Nadu

Updated - April 04, 2018 07:34 am IST

Published - April 04, 2018 12:32 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Supreme Court of India,  in New Delhi.
Photo: Shanker Chakravarty 10-11-2003

The Supreme Court of India, in New Delhi. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty 10-11-2003

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear, on April 9, the Centre’s plea to extend the deadline for framing a scheme to implement its February 16 judgment in the Cauvery water dispute.

Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra said the Centre’s application would be heard along with a contempt petition filed by Tamil Nadu.

Tamil Nadu has accused the Centre of not “protecting the interests of the farmers and the larger interests of the State”. The February 16 judgment in the Cauvery appeals had directed the Centre to frame the scheme in six weeks.

The deadline ended on March 29. On the eve of the deadline, the Centre had moved the Supreme Court for a three-month extension for implementation of the judgment as Assembly elections were scheduled for May 12 in Karnataka.

Seeks clarification

The Centre has also sought clarification on certain points in the judgment.

In its application, the Centre asked the court to clarify if it was open to framing a scheme “at variance” with the tribunal’s recommendations.

For one, it wanted to know whether a Cauvery Management Board (CMB) could have an assemblage of administrative and technical expertise rather than be a purely technical body as envisaged by the Cauvery Tribunal in 2007.

‘Different functions’

Secondly, the Centre asked whether it could accord the CMB with functions different from those recommended by the tribunal.

Finally, the Centre has asked the Supreme Court for its opinion on the framing of the scheme under Section 6A of the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act of 1956, considering the divergent views expressed between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

Tamil Nadu wants the CMB as per the 2007 tribunal order, while Karnataka wants a two-layer scheme, one headed by a committee led by the Union Water Resources Secretary.

Tamil Nadu, which filed the contempt petition, reminded that the Supreme court has clearly banned any extension of time to the Centre for framing the scheme.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.