Justice Karnan vs Supreme Court: saga of a defiant judge

Supreme Court registry dismisses Justice Karnan’s writ petition

Justice C.S. Karnan

Justice C.S. Karnan  

The registry observes that judicial proceedings of the Supreme Court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court registry dismissed a writ petition filed by Justice C.S. Karnan, a Calcutta High Court judge sentenced to six-month imprisonment for contempt, saying the finding of guilt against the convicted judge is final.

Justice Karnan had filed the petition claiming that the contempt proceedings held against him by a Bench of seven senior-most Supreme Court judges led by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar was void ab inito. He had contended that the Bench had no jurisdiction over a sitting High Court judge.

In a detailed written order, the registry differed with Justice Karnan. It held that the “proceedings [of contempt] were decided on merits. After due consideration it was held that Justice Karnan had committed contempt of the gravest nature, resulting in the finding of guilt.” The registry noted that he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for six months. It said these “findings have attained finality.”

It further observed that judicial proceedings of the Supreme Court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution. It concluded that Justice Karnan’s petition was “not maintainable.”

Proceedings challenged

“No reasonable cause to receive the present writ petition under the provisions of Order XV, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013,” the registry held.

Justice Karnan, represented by advocate Mathews Nedumpara, had challenged the contempt proceedings under Section 2 (c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. He had argued that what triggered the proceedings was a letter from him to the Prime Minister alleging corruption in the judiciary.

“A judge is not a court, though without a judge there would be no court. By addressing the Prime Minister about some corrupt judges in a letter, I did not commit any contempt,” the petition had said.

Why you should pay for quality journalism - Click to know more

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Apr 5, 2020 11:31:43 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-registry-dismisses-karnans-writ-petition/article18519150.ece

In Depth
Delhi High Court dismisses Justice Karnan’s plea against contempt law
Karnan petitions Ram Nath Kovind seeking remission of sentence
Jailing a judge: On Justice Karnan arrest
Justice Karnan
Karnan: a long history of confrontation with colleagues
You are reading
Supreme Court registry dismisses Justice Karnan’s writ petition
Jail for contempt: Justice Karnan seeks President’s intervention
Justice Karnan tells SC he wants to challenge his conviction
SC sentences Justice Karnan to six months imprisonment
Karnan orders 5-year RI for CJI, 7 other SC judges
Justice Karnan refuses to undergo medical test
Karnan issues warrant against CJI, six judges
SC orders Karnan to be medically examined
Now, Karnan ‘bans’ travel of SC judges
Justice Karnan's outrageous defiance
Karnan directs SC judges to appear before him
Karnan visits HC, doesn’t do administrative, judicial work
Arrest me, imprison me, Karnan dares SC
Respond to contempt notice in four weeks, SC tells Justice Karnan
Justice Karnan rejects warrant issued by Supreme Court
Justice Karnan threatens to prosecute SC judges
Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Justice Karnan
Justice Karnan fails to show up in SC
Justice Karnan: Contempt notice a violation of natural justice principles
In a first, SC issues contempt notice against HC Judge Karnan
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Passed erroneous order due to mental frustration: Karnan
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Judicial hierarchy comes under strain as Madras HC judge ‘stays’ his transfer
Madras High Court judge C. S. Karnan.
Justice Karnan’s judicial journey
Supreme Court on Monday refused to pass an interim order on a fervent plea of Congress against “illegal” swearing-in of its rebel leader Kalikho Pul-led government in Arunachal Pradesh, saying it can “set the clock back” if the Governor’s actions are found unconstitutional.
Stop allotting work to Justice Karnan, SC tells Madras High Court
Collegium recommends transfer of High Court judges
Next Story