Jail for contempt: Justice Karnan seeks President’s intervention

The judge asks President to exercise powers under Article 72 to suspend his jail sentence.

Updated - December 03, 2021 05:16 pm IST

Published - May 21, 2017 04:22 pm IST - New Delhi

Calcutta High Court judge C.S. Karnan.

Calcutta High Court judge C.S. Karnan.

A fresh representation has been made to the President on behalf of Calcutta High Court judge C.S. Karnan seeking suspension of the Supreme Court order sentencing him to six-month imprisonment for contempt of court, a lawyer representing him has said.

Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara said that he, along with other counsel representing the High Court judge and his son C.S. Sugan, met Ashok Mehta, the Secretary to the President, and handed over an application for suspension of the sentence under Article 72 of the Constitution.

He said they have sought personal audience for Justice Karnan with the President.

The lawyers took the ground in the application that Justice Karnan will be unable to exercise any remedy if he is arrested. The controversial judge has not been arrested yet.

Justice Karnan vs Supreme Court: saga of a defiant judge

“Therefore, an application seeking the President’s intervention under Article 72 has been made,” Mr. Nedumpara said.

Article 72 states that the President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence.

In the application it has been contended that the Supreme Court had acted without jurisdiction, the lawyer said.

On May 9, 2017, a seven-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar, had sentenced Justice Karnan to six months jail for contempt of court and ordered the West Bengal police to take him into custody forthwith.

Mr. Nedumpara had earlier claimed that the defence team made an identical representation to the President through an email. However, the President’s Office had said, “It was not aware of any such representation.”

The latest application has been filed after the apex court’s registry refused to accept Justice Karnan’s petition seeking recall of the May 9 verdict.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.