Ram 'Chabutra' becomes the focal point in Ayodhya hearing

Allahabad HC had deduced the space as birthplace of Ram

Updated - December 03, 2021 08:11 am IST

Published - September 18, 2019 05:29 pm IST - NEW DELHI

 Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. File

Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. File

Justice D.Y. Chandrachud of the Supreme Court on Wednesday wondered if Hindus thronged Ram Chabutra , which 'coincidentally' came up after 1855 along with the railing barricading the Babri Masjid, to actually set their eyes on and pray to the space under the central dome of the mosque, believed to be where Lord Ram was born.

The observation from the judge is significant as the Allahabad High Court, in its 2010 judgment, took a “leap of faith” and deduced the space under the central dome of the masjid, demolished by kar sevaks in 1992, to be the exact birthplace of Lord Ram.


Justice Chandrachud, one of the five judges on the Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, began his remarks by observing that it was “coincidental” that Ram Chabutra came up along with the construction of the railing by the British following an armed clash between Hindus and Muslims in 1855.Prior to that year, both Hindus and Muslims entered it for prayers.

After the violence, Muslims entered the mosque and Hindus prayed at the Chabutra , a platform erected merely 50 yards away from the mosque’s central dome.

“After 1855, Ram Chabutra was erected just outside the railing. It in fact came up along with the railing. So it must be that worshippers believed that praying at the ‘chabutra’ meant actually praying at the central dome... They actually went to pray at the central dome,” Justice Chandrachud observed.

Justice Ashok Bhushan intervened to say, “They went to the railing because they believed that birth happened there [under the central dome]”.

Justice Chandrachud observed, “"Why do you need to pray at the railing? You go to the railing to look beyond the railing.”

‘Preponderance of probabilities

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, for the Sunni Wakf Board, dismissed the judge's reasoning as mere “conjecture”. Justice Chandrachud shot back, saying it was a “preponderance of probabilities”, which the court could indulge in.


“Why did the chabutra become the focal point after 1855? Prior to 1855, both Hindus and Muslims went in... All this upsurge happens after the railing comes up. Why? It may be because of a sense of exclusion among the Hindus. This not just conjecture, but preponderance of probabilities,” Justice Chandrachud addressed Mr. Dhavan.

Mr. Dhavan said the 1850s was a time of inter-se conflict and conquest. “The context of the time was that of a riot situation. British may have come and said 'enough of this nonsense'. But the context then was that of a riot situation. Not just riot, but internecine conflict,” he submitted.

He said Justice Chandrachud was “adding something” not in the case records. “Where is it said from the records that they [Hindu worshippers] prayed to the inner dome from the chabutra ? This is conjecture within the meaning of unreasonable probability... I go till the railing outside the lion's den knowing it is dangerous beyond that,” he argued.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.