Supreme Court thwarts eviction from Railway land in Haldwani

Court says some of the residents have been living there for 50 to 70 years, and cannot be uprooted overnight; suggests rehabilitation and denounces Uttarakhand High Court order allowing use of paramilitary for eviction drive

Updated - January 05, 2023 11:42 pm IST

Published - January 05, 2023 01:29 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Protesters in Haldwani, Uttarakhand on January 5, 2023 after the Supreme Court order staying Uttarakhand High Court direction to evict them from Railway land.

Protesters in Haldwani, Uttarakhand on January 5, 2023 after the Supreme Court order staying Uttarakhand High Court direction to evict them from Railway land. | Photo Credit: ANI

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed a December 20 direction of the Uttarakhand High Court to the Indian Railways and the district administration to use paramilitary forces to evict thousands of poor families occupying railway land in Haldwani district within a week.

A Bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and A.S. Oka remarked that some of these people have been living on the land for 50 to 70 years and could not be evicted within a week.

Haldwani protests | NCPCR objects to ‘use of children’

The court said the issue has a “human angle”. Many proceedings under the Public Premises Act were instituted ex parte against the families during the COVID-19 pandemic. A balance had to be struck between Railways’ need to develop the land and the families right to live with dignity. The rights of the families on the land had to be examined. Even those who have no rights, but have been living there for years, need to be rehabilitated.

“They cannot be uprooted overnight from the land... Somebody has to go into the need for rehabilitation while recognising the need of the Railways,” Justice Kaul said.

“And it was not right to order bringing in paramilitary forces,” Justice Oka remarked.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, for the Railways, said the land around the Kathgodam Railway Station could not be developed and there is a need to open the State to more rail traffic, with Haldwani the nearest location. The land belonged to the Indian Railways. Ms. Bhati said the people had never claimed their right to rehabilitation. Instead, they had claimed right over the land itself.

Senior advocates Colin Gonsalves, Siddharth Luthra and Salman Khurshid, and advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the various affected families, said over 5,000 families were affected. Proceedings against them pertaining to the Public Premises Act were still on. The High Court order had come out of the blue and was ex parte. They had not been given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Children, women and elderly persons among them now faced the prospect of being evicted from their homes in the dead of winter in the biting cold.

Their petition said: “Ours is a welfare state where government authorities need to work towards the well-being and prosperity of the citizens. In the present case, they have proceeded without following due process to issue ex-parte orders against the petitioners and produce arbitrary demarcation report… Such an approach shows an absolute disregard to procedure of law and is in complete violation of basic humanitarian and fundamental rights.”

“These people are not just encroachers... There are multiple issues involved here. They cannot be evicted within the week,” Justice Kaul remarked.

The court issued notice to the Uttarakhand Government while putting a complete stop to the eviction. It listed the case on February 7.

The case was listed urgently on January 5 after Mr. Bhushan, on Wednesday, urged Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud during an oral mentioning that the High Court order had left families in the areas of Banbhulpura and Mohalla Nai Basti in dire straits.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.