Allahabad High Court rejects two women's plea to recognise their marriage

Uttar Pradesh Government argues ‘same-sex marriage against Indian culture and Indic religions’

April 14, 2022 11:01 am | Updated 11:01 am IST - Allahabad:

The women contended that the Hindu Marriage Act talks about the marriage of two people and homosexual marriage has not been opposed by the legislation. File

The women contended that the Hindu Marriage Act talks about the marriage of two people and homosexual marriage has not been opposed by the legislation. File | Photo Credit: Emmanual Yogini

A plea by two women to recognise their marriage on the argument that such union was not "opposed" by the Hindu Marriage Act has been rejected by the Allahabad High Court.

Opposing their plea, the Uttar Pradesh Government's counsel opined that same-sex marriage was against Indian culture and Indic religions, and was invalid under Indian laws.

A Habeas Corpus plea was filed by Anju Devi seeking the custody of her 23-year-old daughter who, she alleged, was illegally detained by a 22-year-old woman.

On April 6, the court directed the State Government counsel to ensure the presence of both the women during the hearing the next day.

The two women presented themselves in the court of Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav on April 7. They told the court that they got married to each other and pleaded that the union be recognised.

The women contended that the Hindu Marriage Act talks about the marriage of two people and homosexual marriage has not been opposed by the legislation.

However, the State Government counsel said, "In Hindu culture, marriage is one of the sanskar and can be performed between a man and a woman.

"Our country runs according to the Indian culture, religions, and Indian law. In India, marriage is considered a sacred sanskar, whereas in other countries, marriage is a contract," the counsel said.

The court rejected the women's request and also disposed of the mother's habeas corpus plea.

The Union Government has opposed same-sex marriage on the ground that marriage in India is not just a union of two individuals but an institution between biological man and woman.

It also said that judicial interference will cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws".

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.