This story is part of
Article 370 abrogation case | The Hindu’s detailed coverage

Article 370 case: SC asks Lone to file affidavit pledging allegiance to Constitution

Government, respondents accuse petitioner and MP Lone of raising pro-Pak. slogans

September 04, 2023 11:45 am | Updated 09:31 pm IST - New Delhi

National Conference leader Mohammad Akbar Lone.

National Conference leader Mohammad Akbar Lone. | Photo Credit: Nissar Ahmad

The Supreme Court on September 4 said it wants National Conference party leader Mohammad Akbar Lone, a petitioner in the Article 370 abrogation challenge case, to file an affidavit stating that he “unconditionally accepts” that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and he owes allegiance to the country’s Constitution.

A Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud asked Mr. Lone to file the affidavit by September 5.

Also read | SC hearing on Article 370 live updates | Day 15

On September 4, the Centre and other respondents accused Mr. Lone, a sitting Member of Parliament, of having raised slogans including “Pakistan Zindabad” in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly in 2018. They said he had till date expressed no remorse about his actions.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for Mr. Lone in the Article 370 case, said his client was a Member of the Lok Sabha. “He has sworn an oath as a Member to the Constitution of India. He is a citizen of India… How can he say otherwise,” Mr. Sibal reacted.

“But what you are saying is only a submission… We want it from him that he unconditionally accepts that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and he abides and owes allegiance to the Constitution,” Chief Justice Chandrachud told Mr. Sibal.

Earlier in the day, Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, for the Union government, demanded that Mr. Lone be made to file an affidavit pledging his allegiance to the Constitution of India.

He had urged the Supreme Court to act, saying if nothing was done, it might encourage others and “the efforts of the nation to bring normalcy, which has been substantially successful, will be affected”.

Mr. Mehta said Mr. Lone was no ordinary person but a sitting MP. The Solicitor-General said Mr. Lone would have been the lead petitioner following the withdrawal of Shah Faesal, had the court not given the generic title ‘In Re Article 370 of the Constitution’ to the case.

“He [Mr. Lone] should file an affidavit saying that ‘I owe allegiance to the Constitution of India because I am before the highest court of the country’. He must say ‘I strongly oppose terrorism and secession by Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir’... He must come on record,” Mr. Mehta said in an impassioned manner

Appearing for other respondents supporting the Centre’s move to repeal Article 370, senior advocates Rakesh Dwivedi and Mahesh Jethmalani said “if he is invoking the Constitution of India here, he cannot stand outside the Constitution of India… It is a matter of propriety”.

Mr. Mehta even said the court should “take up” the submissions of Mr. Lone only if he “apologised”.

Mr. Sibal, appearing for Mr. Lone in the opening days of the challenge to the dilution of Article 370, had argued that the President of India had no blanket powers to silence the will of the people of J&K through a series of executive acts which abolished the Statehood of J&K and abrogated provisions of Article 370.

“There has been no representative democracy in J&K in the past five years… In the guise of restoring democracy, we have decimated democracy. The State of J&K historically represented a unique relationship unlike princely states which integrated into the Union,” he had argued.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.