Survey begins to recover excess land owned by Kerala MLA P.V. Anvar

Action comes in the wake of an order by Thamarassery Taluk Land Use Board

November 02, 2023 12:14 pm | Updated 12:14 pm IST - Kozhikode

P.V. Anvar, MLA

P.V. Anvar, MLA | Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

The Revenue department in Kerala has started survey measures to recover the excess land possessed by P.V. Anvar, MLA, at Kakkadampoyil in Kozhikode district. The action comes in the wake of a recent order by the Thamarassery Taluk Land Use Board.

According to Revenue department sources, the move will result in the forfeiture of 6.25 acres of land after the land survey work. The Thamarassery tahsildar will lead the forfeiture measures initiated based on a report it had submitted earlier to the Kerala State Land Use Board.

It was on July 19 that the Kerala High Court directed the State government and the Zonal Taluk Land Board, Kannur, holding the charge of Thamarassery village to complete the proceedings to recover the excess land in the possession of Mr. Anvar and his family members. There was also an instruction from the court to file a compliance report by October 29, 2023.

The court made its intervention subsequent to a contempt of court petition moved by Malappuram native and human rights activist K.V. Shaji against the government and the land board for not complying with the court’s earlier directive to speed up the proceedings for the recovery of excess land from Mr. Anvar and his family.

According to the complainant, a High Court order in March 2022 had directed the Kerala government and the land board to conclude the proceedings in six months. In the preliminary report, the government had pointed out that Mr. Anvar and his family members were holding 22.82 acres of land over and above the permissible limit and efforts were under way to fast-track the proceedings.

Though the court then granted five months’ time to complete the proceedings, the government and the land board failed to meet it. The chairman of the land board had tendered an unconditional apology and expressed regrets over the delay when the court considered the contempt of court petition.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.