Supreme Court tells Kerala Governor to read up Punjab case verdict

The Supreme Court judgment, in a petition filed by Punjab against its Governor Banwarilal Purohit, clarified that a Governor cannot indefinitely sit on Bills

November 24, 2023 09:32 pm | Updated November 25, 2023 07:39 am IST - NEW DELHI

Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan.

Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan. | Photo Credit: Thulasi Kakkat

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the office of Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan to read up the court’s latest judgment holding Governors responsible for acting within the four corners of the State Legislature without flexing a non-existent veto power over Bills presented to them for assent.

The Supreme Court judgment, in a petition filed by Punjab against its Governor Banwarilal Purohit, clarified that a Governor cannot indefinitely sit on Bills. In case of withholding assent, the Governor should return the Bill as soon as possible to the House with a message assigning reasons for his lack of consent.

Editorial | No vote for veto: On Governors and their powers

The judgment held that the Governor cannot withhold consent in case the House repassed the Bill with or without amendments.

“The Punjab judgment will entirely cover our case… He [Governor] has been sitting on our Bills for two years,” senior advocate K.K. Venugopal, appearing for Kerala, told a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud.

The Chief Justice said the Kerala Governor’s office should go through the judgment in the Punjab case and make up their minds on the future course of action.

“The Governor’s secretary should look at the judgment and see what he has to say,” said Chief Justice Chandrachud, scheduling the case for November 28.

‘An endemic’

In a previous hearing, Mr. Venugopal and advocate C.K. Sasi said delaying consent on Bills had grown to be an “endemic” among Governors of certain States.

Also read | States in Court against their Governors

Mr. Venugopal said the Bills were pending for eight to 23 months. The Governor was a part of the State Legislature under Article 168. The Governor cannot act in a way which was contrary to the wishes of the elected representatives of the people, the senior lawyer had argued.

Article 168 spells out that “for every State, there shall be a Legislature which shall consist of the Governor and two Houses to be known respectively as the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly”.

Kerala said the Governor was trying to “defeat the rights of the people” of the State by indefinitely sitting on crucial Bills, especially those addressing post-COVID public health concerns.

The State said the arbitrary show of lack of urgency by the Governor violated the fundamental right to life of the people of Kerala.

Kerala said eight key Bills were currently pending with the Governor.

“Many of the Bills involve immense public interest, and provide for welfare measures which would stand deprived and denied to the people of the State to the extent of the delay… Grave injustice is being done to the people of the State, as also to its representative democratic institutions,” the Kerala petition said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.