Comments in TV show: Pandya and Rahul pay for indiscretion

The two had been omitted from the line-up for the opening match in Sydney.

January 11, 2019 04:42 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:39 am IST - Mumbai

Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul

Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul

The Board of Control for Cricket in India has suspended Hardik Pandya and K.L. Rahul, pending an enquiry, for comments made on the TV show ‘Koffee with Karan’.

BCCI legal cell member Indranil Deshmukh advised the Committee of Administrators (CoA), following a request from member Diana Edulji, of the action that may be taken. CoA head Vinod Rai had wanted a two-match ban on disciplinary count.

Edulji had also sought the views of BCCI acting president C.K. Khanna, acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary and treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry.

The BCCI action has ruled out the participation of the two players in part or whole of the five-match ODI series against Australia.

Talking to The Hindu , Edulji said: “There is no question of the players staying back in Australia, they have to return to India and face an enquiry. The selectors have been told about the BCCI decision.”

Deshmukh advised BCCI to strictly adhere to Rule 41 of the Constitution and seek explanation from them as to why they should not be proceeded against for misconduct and indiscipline.

The note addressed to Edulji said: “The show cause letter (to Pandya and Rahul) should specify that (i) the same is being issued under Rule 41 of the BCCI Constitution and (ii) an enquiry against them has commenced. We are of the view that there is a risk of the communications sent by the BCCI to the players on 9th January 2019 not being construed as a communication under Rule 41 of the BCCI Constitution.

“This is because the said communications dated 9th January 2019 do not contain the specifications/ingredients mentioned hereinabove. Therefore, to ensure that there are no procedural missteps, it would be preferable that fresh communications are issued by the CEO to the concerned players...”

A view among BCCI members is that there is no need to appoint an ad-hoc Ombudsman and that a five-member committee consisting of the CoA, Khanna, Choudhary and Chaudhry should conduct the enquiry.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.