Study reveals locked-down people favoured ‘old school tech’ during Coronavirus pandemic

Just barely a month into the COVID-19 pandemic that kicked off in 2020, cell phone companies, Internet providers, and video chat and social media platforms all reported huge spikes in traffic

March 08, 2021 12:31 pm | Updated March 09, 2021 01:10 pm IST

When stay-at-home orders were announced as one of the greatest tools in our arsenal against the COVID-19 pandemic, anyone who's vintage enough to have watched forward-looking shows and movies — from The Jetsons to Star Trek to Back to the Future — might have thought the masses were ready to embrace a world where video calling and other tech-heavy communication options reigned supreme.

But one year, dozens of Zoom meetings, hundreds of phone calls and text messages, thousands of online gaming hours, and millions of social media posts later, new research led by University of Nevada, Las Vegas, has found that the tech mediums we once thought were the way of the future actually don't stack up very well against old-fashioned face-to-face communication. At least not in the order we imagined.

‘Connecting During COVID-19’, a study slated for publication this month in the journal Human Communication & Technology , found that older technologies like voice calls and emails were more effective at easing pandemic loneliness and stress than newer options like video chats, social media, and interactive video games. Just barely a month into the pandemic, cell phone companies, internet providers, and video chat and social media platforms all reported huge spikes in traffic, according to data cited within the study.

“Age, relationship status, and living situation were the three big factors that shifted how people were impacted by tech,” said Natalie Pennington, a UNLV communication studies professor and social media expert, who collaborated on the study with University of Kansas professor Jeff Hall and Michigan State University associate professor Amanda Holmstrom.

Here, Pennington shares her top 10 most interesting findings from her research on social media and communication technology use during the pandemic.

Top 10 Takeaways

1. The most used and most important types of communication were phone calls and texting.

This is consistent with what we know about phone calls during the early days of the pandemic: In April 2020, the number of daily voice calls was twice that of the peak traffic day in 2019. “It's a nice pushback on our general expectations about video chat having risen up during the pandemic,” Pennington said.

2. Phone calls were associated with decreases in stress, loneliness, and relationship maintenance difficulties.

“When I’m on a voice call, I can multitask, move around, and I might not be as stressed as I would if I were having to give 100% of my focus to a video chat,” Pennington said. “At the same time, hearing someone's voice can help me feel connected in a way that I might not get from texting.”

3. Video chats, on the other hand, were associated with increased levels of stress, loneliness, and relationship difficulties.

“On a theoretical level, you'd think that the richer the medium, the better it is because it can approximate face-to-face communication,” Pennington said. “But because video chat tries to be face-to-face when it's not, I think it almost makes you even more sad that you can see the person yet they're not actually there; because you can't get those context clues, those haptics, those things that make us like being in a room with a person.”

What's more: Think about the energy required for a video chat--you have to give your full focus, which can make them draining for those not used to the medium. It's no wonder people are talking about ‘Zoom fatigue.’ This stands as a good reminder to switch up modalities for what works best for you versus what you think you should be using.

Read More | All you need to know about ‘Zoom Fatigue’

Further study is needed, but Pennington hypothesises that research will find video chat, while a helpful supplement, isn't a good replacement for in-person interactions.

4. Social media posting, commenting, and sharing was the modality most strongly associated with stress.

Early research during the pandemic highlighted an increase in ‘doomscrolling’ or ‘infinite scrolling’ which Pennington hypothesises is connected to her team's finding.

Read More | The infinite hypothesis of infinite scroll

“Not talking about the pandemic is one of the biggest things to help people get through the pandemic,” she said. “When you're stressed out, that fixation and rumination while posting and commenting and talking about that stress online can make it worse. Social media can also serve as a reminder of the things you are no longer able to do as you shelter in place, which can make you feel worse.”

5. Those in a romantic relationship reported less loneliness and stress compared to those who were not. However, people in romantic relationships were also more likely to experience stress related to social media posting.

“Together, these findings help us see that the types of relationships we're sustaining can help us during the pandemic. But our modality choices, above and beyond, can flip us in the other direction,” Pennington said. “The person who is least stressed is in a relationship but not using social media. But the person who's most stressed is in a relationship and is using social media. And the no-relationship, no-social media person is the middle zone.”

6. Being sheltered in place created a greater perception of loneliness and stress, and more difficulty with relationship maintenance.

This one tracks when you think about the state of the world. Being told you should limit gatherings and stay home, regardless of your usual habits, can lead to more stress, and cause feelings of loneliness when you think about the people you could have been spending time with. The increased difficulty managing relationships likely points to potential stress in the home — finding alone time is important to help balance needs and avoid difficulties.

7. At the same time, living alone was unassociated with loneliness and maintenance difficulties, suggesting having someone in the house doesn't always help (especially since it was also associated with less stress).

“You can feel cooped up with people around you, once again pointing to the importance of some alone time,” she said.

8. Older and middle-aged adults were able to make use of email as a way to decrease loneliness, while young adults (under 29) experienced increased loneliness alongside the use of email.

One reason for this may be familiarity with and preference for letter-writing: Younger generations may perceive email as a poor substitute for interaction, while older and middle-aged adults may find comfort in the nostalgic structure that email provides to connect with loved ones.

“Some people love it, some people hate it, and I think age has something to do with that,” Pennington said, “because younger people tend to associate email with work. So, trying to make use of it in a social way, especially when it's one of the leanest forms of communication that just relies on text, means it's not for everyone.”

9. Online gaming was associated with greater stress and more relational maintenance challenges.

The survey didn't delve into the reasons why. But Pennington posits that it may be that in people's attempts to escape their pandemic realities via online gaming, they left their emotional needs and social connections unattended. As a result, they perhaps felt more challenges in their day-to-day communication with other people.

The correlations surrounding online gaming were especially interesting given that gaming consoles sold out during the early days of the pandemic, said Pennington. “There was a drive to do these things, but connecting online seemed to make people more stressed.”

10. Face-to-face communication wins out.

Nothing can really replicate face-to-face interactions — or at least not the modes of communication analysed in Pennington's study. Across the board, her team found that people who engaged in face-to-face interactions were the least stressed and lonely.

“This is a good reminder and encouragement that in order to get our social needs met, we want to take active steps to be safe and smart, and stop the spread of COVID-19,” Pennington said, “so that meeting in person is a viable option going forward.”

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.