What is 'Condorcet paradox' in Statistics?

November 30, 2017 12:02 am | Updated 12:02 am IST

The Condorcet paradox, whose origins are associated with the 18th century French philosopher, Marquis de Condorcet, is a formulation within social choice theory which postulates that even if preferences of individual voters are transitive, i.e. not cyclical, the collective preferences of society may be cyclical. For example, if a society prefers candidate x over y, y over z, it may nevertheless pick z over x rather than x over z. This voting paradox stems from the fact that conflicting majorities are not necessarily made up of individuals with identical preference orderings over the three candidates.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.