Unfriend the thought police

Updated - December 04, 2021 10:54 pm IST

Published - November 21, 2012 12:34 am IST

There can be only one response to the patently illegal action of Maharashtra police in arresting two young women for exercising their constitutional right to free speech and expression on Facebook: the officers and personnel involved must be made an example of. They should face the full force of the law, leading to the maximum penalty for wrongful arrest, illegal restraint and confinement. Only then will the message go out that trampling on constitutional freedoms will invite severe consequences. Their illegal act was made worse by the craven manner in which the police kowtowed to a violent lumpen group in Palgarh, Thane, which found the Facebook comment by one of the women on the Mumbai shutdown following Bal Thackeray’s death, and its endorsement by her friend, objectionable. What stands out in this episode, and similar ones earlier, is the readiness of the police to make arbitrary arrests and cloak their censorial actions using a combination of Indian Penal Code sections that have no place in a free country, and the infamous Section 66A of the Information Technology Act which deals with offensive messages. It mattered little to them when using Section 505(2) of the IPC on promotion of hatred, ill-will or enmity, that their case grossly fails the test of mens rea , or intent. After all, what can be illegal about expressing an opinion about so public an event as the complete shutdown of the country’s financial capital?

The rise of community websites as networks of hope for the average citizen is obviously discomfiting many in authority. The capacity of the medium to name, shame and embarrass far exceeds the ability of the high and mighty to control it. Their response has been to use the police to settle scores with some, and thus send out the message to the majority. Brazen misuse of the power to arrest continues, because there is no significant penal outcome. There are clear Supreme Court guidelines on making an arrest, which have been blatantly violated in the case of the ‘Facebook women’ and many others before them. As the court pointed out in Joginder Kumar vs State Of U.P. , an arrest cannot be made simply because it is legal; the police officer must be able to justify the act. The Palgarh police stand naked in the eyes of law on this count. They have no justification for what they did and are prima facie contemnors. As a nation, India must worry about the rapidly shrinking space for freedom of speech and expression, and act resolutely now. Section 66A of the IT Act which nullifies constitutional free speech guarantees must go. Equally, Maharashtra must be compelled to restrain the Shiv Sena’s proclivity for violence towards people with a counter view.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.