Tamil Nadu says Andhra Pradesh’s check-dam proposal across Palar river goes against federalism, amounts to contempt of court

Water Resources Minister Duraimurugan, in a statement, said the proposal was not only violative of an 1892 agreement between the States, but also went against the two States’ friendship; also, two related cases are pending at the Supreme Court

Updated - February 27, 2024 04:18 pm IST

Published - February 27, 2024 03:27 pm IST - CHENNAI

T.N. Minister for Water Resources Duraimurugan

T.N. Minister for Water Resources Duraimurugan | Photo Credit: VENKATACHALAPATHY C

Tamil Nadu’s Minister for Water Resources Duraimurugan on Tuesday, February 27, 2024, said that Andhra Pradesh’s proposal to construct a check-dam across the Palar river went against the ideal of federalism, and was not acceptable in the friendship between the two States.

“When cases are pending before the Supreme Court, such steps [Andhra Pradesh allocating funds in the Budget for the construction of the check-dam across the Palar] should not be undertaken,” Mr. Duraimurugan said in a statement.

As per the 1892 agreement between then Mysore and Madras, no construction of a dam or any other related activity was allowed without the consent of the riparian States, the Minister pointed out. The Supreme Court too, in its judgement delivered on February 16, 2018, clearly said that the two agreements signed in 1892 and 1924 covered areas of large public interests which do not have any political element and in this backdrop, the agreements were neither inoperative nor completely extinct.

“While so, Andhra Pradesh’s arbitrary attempt to construct a new dam is violative of the 1892 agreement. Moreover, it is totally against the observation of the Supreme Court. This is a wrong attempt,” Mr. Duraimurugan contended.

Recalling the Tamil Nadu government’s litigation moved in the Supreme Court in 2006, when Andhra attempted to construct a dam at Ganesapuram in Chittoor district, he said that the final hearing of the case was about to be given. Another case has been moved in the Supreme Court opposing Andhra Pradesh’s attempt to increase the height of the existing check-dam across the Palar and this too, is pending before the apex court, he said.

“When two cases are pending before the Supreme Court, the Andhra Pradesh government’s attempting to construct a dam across Palar and allocating funds for the project, should be considered contempt of the court,” Mr. Duraimurugan said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.