RSS route march | Madras High Court summons T.N. Home Secretary, DGP over contempt petitions

The Court ordered the issuance of statutory notices, requiring the presence of the officials before the court after four weeks; the contempt petitions were filed as the RSS was not granted permission for its route marches despite a court order

Updated - November 01, 2023 04:55 pm IST

Published - November 01, 2023 04:42 pm IST - CHENNAI

RSS members at a route march in Tiruchi earlier this year. File photograph used for representational purposes only. File

RSS members at a route march in Tiruchi earlier this year. File photograph used for representational purposes only. File | Photo Credit: Gnanavel Murugan

The Madras High Court has summoned Tamil Nadu Home Secretary P. Amudha, Director-General of Police (DGP) Shankar Jiwal and a few other police officials, on five contempt of court petitions filed against them for having failed to grant permission to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) route marches at various places across the State.

Justice G. Jayachandran ordered issuance of statutory notices, which require the presence of the officials before the court after four weeks, to all the officials who have been named in the contempt of court petitions. The orders were passed after hearing senior counsel G. Rajagopal representing the RSS office-bearers.

Mr. Rajagopal brought it to the notice of the judge that the court had passed a common order on October 16, 2023, directing the police to grant permission for the route marches in 35 places on October 22 and 29, 2023. However, in blatant disobedience of the judicial order, no such permission was granted, he complained.

On the other hand, Additional Public Prosecutor (APP) R. Muniyapparaj told the court that appeals had been filed against the High Court order and they were expected to be listed for hearing before the Supreme Court on November 3. He requested the judge to grant him a short accommodation to obtain further instructions from the officials.

However, the judge refused to accept the request and wrote: “This court on considering the facts of the case is prima facie convinced that the respondents are either incapable of administering the State or had ignored the order of this court with scant respect to the judiciary. Hence, statutory notice is issued to the respondents.”

Though the APP urged the judge to reconsider the order dictated by him in open court and grant him at least an hour’s time to obtain instructions, the judge said: “Not necessary. I have passed my order. Let me proceed. You convince this court after four weeks. Don’t force this court to say something. It is better both of us keep quiet for now.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.