CM evades question on who ordered firing

Blames Opposition parties, anti-social elements for instigating protesters

May 25, 2018 01:03 am | Updated 01:03 am IST - Chennai

Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami addressing the media on Thursday.

Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami addressing the media on Thursday.

Countering charges against the State government and questions on the need for police firing which claimed the lives of 13 anti-Sterlite protesters in Thoothukudi, Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami on Thursday accused the Opposition parties and anti-social elements of instigating the protesters with an intention to malign the reputation of the government.

In an interaction with the media for the first time since the firing on May 22, Mr. Palaniswami rejected claims that the firing was pre-planned. He chose to address the press after a drama on the Secretariat campus following a dharna staged by DMK working president and the Leader of the Opposition M.K. Stalin, who claimed that the CM refused to meet him.

He evaded queries about who gave permission to open fire at the protesters. When asked about the need for police to fire at unarmed protesters, Mr. Palaniswami said it was only natural human tendency to self defend in the face of an attack. Mr. Palaniswami maintained that the Opposition parties and anti-social elements instigated the protesters.

The police initially used tear gas and then resorted to lathi charge, Mr. Palaniswami contended. But, protesters still went about torching vehicles at the Collectorate and also on Sterlite campus, he claimed and added: “They attempted to enter the Collectorate. We came to know about all this only through the media. Because I was here and you are all aware [that CM was in Secretariat for the review meetings].”

Replying to a query as to why he has not visited the riot-hit city yet, hesaid promulgation orders were in place and everyone should respect the law. “However, some political party leaders are visiting despite the promulgation orders.”

As for Mr. Stalin’s claim that the CM refused to meet him, Mr. Palaniswami said Mr. Stalin was in fact present at the Assembly Business Advisory Committee meeting and that he was surprised to see Mr. Stalin making contrary claims later.

“He [Mr. Stalin] could have told me during the meeting that he would give a plea to me later in the chamber. But, he chose to do this later,” Mr. Palaniswami said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.