Apex court stays criminal contempt proceedings against Arundhati Roy

When Bench asked whether she would like to tender an apology for her article, she bluntly refused the offer.

Updated - July 03, 2017 10:01 pm IST

Published - July 03, 2017 02:38 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Activist and Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy.

Activist and Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy.

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed criminal contempt proceedings against author and Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy for publishing an article expressing her personal anguish in the prosecution and incarceration of paraplegic former Delhi University professor G.N. Saibaba.

Saibaba was, later in March 2017, sentenced to life imprisonment for Maoist links.

When the Bench led by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar asked whether she would like to tender an apology for her article and end the case against her, Ms. Roy, through her counsel, bluntly refused the offer.

“This is not at all a case for an apology,” senior advocate C.U. Singh, flanked by advocate Prashant Bhushan, responded to the court.

Immediately thereafter, the CJI ordered further proceedings in the Bombay High Court to be stayed. Ms. Roy had argued that the criminal case against her was tantamount to choking the voice of opposition in a democracy and produced an “intense chilling effect” on the fundamental right of free expression.

Personal anguish

The article published in an English magazine, Mr. Singh said, had only revealed the author’s personal anguish at the plight of Mr. Saibaba, who is ninety per cent disabled, wheelchair-bound and suffers from a degenerative medical condition that requires constant medical care.

She contended there was no “game plan” or “mala fide motive” to interfere in the administration of justice on behalf of Mr. Saibaba.

“By criticising the actions or the lack thereof, of the Legislature, the Judiciary or the Executive, a citizen is merely exercising his or her fundamental right to express ‘opposition’ to the government or one of its wings. Such opposition is fundamental to the very meaning of democracy and should be recognised as a basic feature of the Constitution of India,” Ms. Roy had contended against the December 23, 2015 criminal contempt notice served on her.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.