Supreme Court agrees to urgently hear plea on 150 Rohingya refugees ‘detained’ in Jammu

Mohammad Salimullah says his application is based on reports in The Hindu and other media outlets that Rohingya members had been detained in a sub-jail in Jammu.

March 18, 2021 12:27 pm | Updated 11:58 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Rohingya refugees during a verification process initiated by Jammu and Kashmir police outside their makeshift camp on the outskirts of Jammu on March 9, 2021.

Rohingya refugees during a verification process initiated by Jammu and Kashmir police outside their makeshift camp on the outskirts of Jammu on March 9, 2021.

The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to urgently hear a plea to release and protect over 150 Rohingya refugees reportedly “detained” in Jammu.

Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde agreed to hear the application filed by a member of the Rohingya community, Mohammad Salimullah, represented by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Cheryl d’Souza, on April 25 (Thursday). Mr. Bhushan made an oral mention before the CJI for an early hearing.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the averments made in the application were “factually wrong”.

Mr. Salimullah, who is already a petitioner in the Supreme Court against the deportment of Rohingyas, said his application was based on reports in The Hindu and other media outlets that Rohingya members had been detained in a sub-jail in Jammu.

“This follows the Union Minister Jitendra Singh’s statements two months ago that the Rohingya (identified as Muslim refugees by the government) would not be able to secure citizenship. These refugees have been illegally detained and jailed in the Jammu sub-jail, which has been converted into a holding centre with the IGP (Jammu) Mukesh Singh stating that they face deportation back to Myanmar following verification by their embassy,” the application has said.

Refugee identification cards

The application urged the court to “release the detained Rohingya refugees immediately and direct the Union Territory government and the Ministry of Home Affairs to expeditiously grant refugee identification cards through the FRRO for the Rohingyas in the informal camps”.

It further requested the court to direct the Centre to refrain from implementing any orders on deporting the Rohingya refugees detained in the sub-jail in Jammu.

The application said the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees should be asked to “intervene and determine the protection needs of the Rohingya refugees not just in Jammu but also in camps across the country and complete the process of granting them refugee cards”.

“News reports started coming in around March 7, 2021 regarding the nearly 150-170 Rohingya refugees in Jammu being detained. Disturbing reports from the Rohingya families have come in that subsequent to a biometric verification of Rohingya refugees undertaken by the Jammu and Kashmir administration, some people never returned to the camps from the verification but were detained and jailed by the police,” the application said.

It quotes from a report in The Hindu detailing how “panic has gripped this already marginalised refugee community in Jammu after the verification drive and disappearance of family members”.

‘6,523 Rohingya in Jammu’

The application said official documents from the office of Deputy Commissioner of Jammu show there were 6,523 Rohingya in Jammu.

In India, no legislation has been passed yet that specifically refers to refugees. Hence, Rohingya refugees are often clubbed with the class of illegal immigrants deported by the government under the Foreigners Act 1946 and the Foreigners Order 1948. This is coupled with discrimination against the Rohingya by the government, they being largely Muslim refugees. Legally, however, a refugee is a special category of immigrant and cannot be clubbed with an illegal immigrant.

India is bound to adhere to the principle of non-refoulement through customary international law, the application contended

The principle of non-refoulement — or not sending refugees to a place where they face danger — is a norm of customary international law.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.