Rajya Sabha Chairman reiterates confidentiality clause to House panel heads

Violation of this will tantamount to ‘breach of privilege of the House’, says Naidu.

Updated - August 26, 2020 10:25 pm IST

Published - August 26, 2020 10:24 pm IST - New Delhi:

Vice-President M. Venkaiah Naidu.

Vice-President M. Venkaiah Naidu.

A day after Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla wrote to chairpersons of parliamentary standing committees advising them to ensure confidentiality of panel meetings, Rajya Sabha Chairman M. Venkaiah Naidu too wrote an advisory on similar lines.

Also read | Cancel Parliament panel meeting on suspension of Internet services in Jammu & Kashmir: Dubey to Tharoor

Writing to heads of eight standing committees that come under the Rajya Sabha purview, Mr. Naidu said the committees were mandated to carry out a detailed scrutiny of legislative proposals which was not feasible for Parliament to do so in transaction of its day-to-day business. While commending the standing committees, he wrote, “However, for some time now, it has been observed that the media has been found quoting, in their reportage, the proceedings of the committees related to the subject matters or the legislative Bills under their consideration and examination.”

He reiterated the rules and procedures that govern the meetings of the parliamentary panels. The meetings are confidential and “it is not permissible for a member of the committee or anyone who has access to its proceedings to communicate, directly or indirectly, to the media any information regarding its proceedings, including any part of the report or any conclusions arrived at by the committee finally or tentatively before the report has been presented to the House.” Violation of this would tantamount to “breach of privilege of the House,” Mr. Naidu said.

Rule 270

On Tuesday, Mr. Birla, in a letter, had sought to remind the panel chairpersons to Rule 270 of the ‘Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha’, which says that a “Committee shall have power to send for persons, papers and records”; however, “if any question arises whether the evidence of a person or the production of a document is relevant for the purposes of the committee, the question shall be referred to the Speaker whose decision shall be final.”

Mr. Birla’s letter came days after BJP MPs wrote to him demanding removal of Congress leader Shashi Tharoor who heads the parliamentary panel on IT after he summoned Facebook .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.