Vigilance court dismisses Congress MLA Kuzhalnadan plea against Kerala CM's daughter's firm

Thiruvananthapuram vigilance court dismisses Congress MLA’s plea for probe into financial transactions involving CM’s daughter

May 06, 2024 03:33 pm | Updated 03:33 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s daughter Veena Vijayan

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s daughter Veena Vijayan | Photo Credit: TH

A vigilance court on May 6 dismissed the petition filed by Congress MLA Mathew Kuzhalnadan seeking a court-monitored probe into the alleged financial transactions between a private mining company and the now-defunct IT company of T. Veena, the daughter of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

Mr. Kuzhalnadan had initially approached the Special Vigilance Court here, saying the Vigilance Department refused to probe the financial transactions between Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd. (CMRL) and Ms. Veena's company Exalogic.

Later, he changed his stance and sought a court-monitored probe into the alleged financial transactions.

The court dismissed the plea after a detailed hearing on the documents submitted by the Congress legislator.

Meanwhile, Mr. Kuzhalnadan said the order was unexpected and will take further action after going through the judgement.

Earlier, a Vigilance Special Court, Muvattupuzha, had dismissed a plea by a social activist for an investigation into the alleged illegal financial transactions between CMRL, Ms. Veena's firm, and the suspected political leaders for want of evidence.

The High Court is currently hearing a revision petition challenging that order in the matter.

A controversy had erupted in Kerala after media reports that the CMRL had paid a total of ₹1.72 crore to the CM's daughter between 2017 and 2020.

The reports cited the ruling of an interim board for settlement and said that CMRL previously had an agreement with Ms. Veena's IT firm for consulting and software support services.

It was also alleged that though no service was rendered by her firm, the amount was paid on a monthly basis "due to her relationship with a prominent person." The report also cited findings by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) against her firm.

Quoting the ROC report, the Congress-led UDF opposition claimed that offences of receiving money using false documents and without providing services had been committed by Ms. Veena's firm.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.