Lokayukta police told to file FIR against Somanna

Updated - November 17, 2021 12:36 am IST

Published - November 22, 2011 02:48 pm IST - Bangalore

A file picture of former Chief Minister of Karnataka B.S. Yeddyurappa. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy

A file picture of former Chief Minister of Karnataka B.S. Yeddyurappa. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy

The Special Lokayukta Court on Tuesday ordered the Lokayukta Police to file an FIR against the former Chief Minister B.S. Yeddyurappa and Housing Minister V. Somanna and investigate the complaint of land grab against them.

The order was passed under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The probe will be headed by the Lokayukta Superintendent of Police (Bangalore Urban). The court has given him time until December 26 to submit his findings.

If the Lokayukta Police find evidence against the accused, their probe will culminate in the submission of a charge sheet.

The order of Judge N.K. Sudhindra Rao is a result of a complaint filed by software engineer-turned social-activist Ravi Krishna Reddy, who on November 17 iled a private complaint before the court alleging that Mr. Yeddyurappa and Mr. Somanna were complicit in the illegal denotification of a plot that had been acquired by the Bangalore Development Authority for the formation of the Jnanabharathi Layout.

Mr. Reddy, who had made an unsuccessful bid in the 2008 Assembly elections as an independent candidate, alleged that 22 guntas (each gunta is about 1,080 sq. ft) of land belonging to one D. Lingaiah (Accused Number 4) had been acquired by the BDA by paying him compensation and even handed over to the engineering section for development.

On September 4, 2004, Mr. Lingaiah allegedly sold the land to Ms. Shylaja ignoring the fact that the land no longer belonged to him and was in fact government property.

On March 14, 2005 Mr. Lingaiah executed a “rectification deed” in favour of Ms. Shylaja claiming that the land acquired by the BDA had been returned to him through a denotification order dates March 4, 2005. But the fact, according to the complainant, was that the denotification was never published in the official gazette and hence was invalid.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.