Don’t rush through judges selection: Sathasivam

Advice from retiring CJI to Chief Justices of High Courts

April 26, 2014 12:12 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:26 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam (right) with CJI-designate R.M. Lodha at a farewell function in New Delhi on Friday. Photo: R.V. Moorthy

Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam (right) with CJI-designate R.M. Lodha at a farewell function in New Delhi on Friday. Photo: R.V. Moorthy

The Supreme Court Bar Association and fellow judges on Friday bid a warm farewell to Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, who retires on Saturday after a successful tenure of about seven years as Supreme Court judge. He leaves an indelible imprint as a humane and unassuming judge. Justice Gyan Sudha Misra, who is retiring on Sunday, was also given a farewell.

CJI-designate R.M. Lodha praised Justice Sathasivam for his simplicity and commitment to justice. He said, “The Supreme Court represents no class, no caste, no majority, no minority and I would try to ensure a balance to all.”

Justice Sathasivam explained the steps he took for speedy disposal of cases and efforts to reduce pendency. He said, “The public always has a compelling interest in justice delivery. We must not only strive towards excellence but also be open and as accessible as possible.” He wanted the Chief Justices of the High Courts to ensure that the process of selection of judges was done progressively and not hurried through thoughtlessly.

Justice Sathasivam was known for his honesty and integrity and he endeared himself to members of the Bar with a smiling face, even when he dismissed a case. Lawyers are unanimous that his absence will be felt.

Justice Sathasivam, who was appointed Supreme Court judge in August 2007, gave several landmark judgments, which included a valiant pronouncement in the matter of Pakistani national Mohammad Khalil Chisti vs. the State of Rajasthan. He set aside Mr. Chisti’s conviction under Section 302 of the IPC and allowed him to go back to his country.

The CJI said there should not be any discrimination in fixation of pension when a person who occupied the constitutional office of High Court judge retired.

Heading a Bench, Justice Sathasivam commuted the death sentence awarded to Devendra Pal Singh Bhullar in the 1993 Delhi blast case to life imprisonment, holding that inordinate and unexplained delay in disposal of a mercy petition by the President and mental illness were grounds for commutation. He laid down the law on delay in disposal of a mercy petition by the President, holding that even death-row convicts were entitled to life and liberty guaranteed under the Constitution.

Among the notable judgments delivered by him on election laws are rejection of a candidate’s nomination for non-disclosure of information in affidavit.

In the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, Justice Sathasivam first ordered commutation of the death sentence of three convicts to life term. On Friday, he referred the issues to be adjudicated by a five-judge Constitution Bench.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.