Gyanvyapi mosque row: Allahabad HC stays ASI survey till August 3

Court asks petitioners and government why the matter has being dragged for two years

Updated - July 27, 2023 09:52 pm IST - NEW DELHI

An Aerial view shows Gyanvapi mosque, left, and Kashiviswanath temple on the banks of the river Ganges in Varanasi, India, Dec. 12, 2021.

An Aerial view shows Gyanvapi mosque, left, and Kashiviswanath temple on the banks of the river Ganges in Varanasi, India, Dec. 12, 2021. | Photo Credit: AP

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday stayed the Archaeological Survey Of India (ASI) survey of the Gyanvyapi Mosque in Varanasi till August 3, the date on which the court will also pronounce its final verdict on the mosque dispute.

At the end of a three-day marathon hearing on a plea filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, challenging the Varanasi District judge’s July 21 order to conduct a survey of the mosque by ASI, the HC asked the government and counsels of the petitioners from all sides why this matter had been dragged for the last two years.

This is the third time this week that the ASI survey has been stayed. The Supreme Court had stayed the survey on July 24, giving the Gyanvapi mosque management “breathing time” to approach the High Court. The HC too had stayed the same on July 26 and again on July 27.

Opposing arguments

Advocate S.F.A. Naqvi, appearing for the mosque committee, expressed his apprehension that the survey could damage the structure.

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing some Hindu petitioners, told the court that Sanskrit shlokas, an old Jyotirlinga, and other Hindu artefacts were present inside the mosque.

Advocate Saurabh Tiwary, representing one of the petitioners Rakhi Singh, told the court that an ASI survey was necessary because the mosque commitee has insisted that the claim of a Hindu structure is based on imagination and has nothing to do with ground reality.

Explained | The Gyanvapi Mosque-Kashi Vishwanath dispute and the current case

The Advocate-General, representing the State, argued that the local court’s order to conduct an ASI survey was “very innocuous” and aims only to ascertain the truth. He also added that the State would ensure that there will not be any law-and-order problems, no matter what verdict was finally issued by the Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.