Sri Lanka accountability process would be purely domestic: FM

Sri Lanka opted for a domestic mechanism despite the UN rights chief Seid Raad Al Hussein called for a hybrid court to carry out prosecutions into the rights abuse cases.

Updated - September 06, 2016 09:27 am IST

Published - October 24, 2015 03:08 pm IST - Colombo

The process to fix accountability as mandated by the latest UNHRC resolution for the alleged rights abuses during the conflict with the LTTE will be completely domestic, Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera has said rejecting claims that it was a hybrid mechanism.

Mr. Samaraweera told Parliament on Friday that the process would be completely domestic and dismissed the Opposition claim that it would instead be a hybrid mechanism and would also investigate war-crimes allegations.

“I wish to stress that this would be a Sri Lankan process, not a hybrid process. It will be the Sri Lankan institutions and systems who will be implementing the process,” he said.

Mr. Samaraweera was addressing a two-day debate in Parliament on the UNHRC resolution, which called for a domestic mechanism to investigate alleged rights abuses during the last stages of the military campaign against the LTTE that ended in 2009.

The resolution co-sponsored by Sri Lanka and drafted by the US has called for a domestic inquiry involving foreign experts.

The Opposition argued that the resolution was a “give in” to the US, and despite government assurances there will be a “hybrid court” [involving foreigners] to try Sri Lankan military officials.

Sri Lanka’s new government under President Maithripala Sirisena, however, says that better international engagements — since the defeat of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa — it was able to prevent Sri Lankan political and military leaders from being tried in international court.

It was under Rajapaksa’s tenure that the Sri Lankan forces defeated the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the separatist group that waged armed insurgency against the government.

The UN has estimated that 40,000 people died, many of them civilians, during the 26-year civil war.

Sri Lanka opted for a domestic mechanism despite the UN rights chief Seid Raad Al Hussein called for a hybrid court to carry out prosecutions into the rights abuse cases.

Mr. Samaraweera said to prevent violence, abuse and impunity and to ensure the recognition of the suffering of those who had lost loved ones, the government proposed to set up a truth commission and a compassionate council consisting of religious leaders.

He also proposed to set up an office of missing persons with support from the International Committee of the Red Cross, a judicial mechanism with a special counsel to address the problem of impunity and an office of reparation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.