Bombay High Court reserves order in plea filed by Kangana Ranaut against BMC demolition

Actor had sought compensation of ₹2 crore from the civic body

October 05, 2020 11:59 am | Updated October 06, 2020 12:54 pm IST - Mumbai

Mumbai: Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) officers demolish 'illegal alterations' at the Bandra bungalow of Bollywood actress Kangana Ranaut, in Mumbai, Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2020. (PTI Photo/Mitesh Bhuvad)(PTI09-09-2020_000074A)

Mumbai: Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) officers demolish 'illegal alterations' at the Bandra bungalow of Bollywood actress Kangana Ranaut, in Mumbai, Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2020. (PTI Photo/Mitesh Bhuvad)(PTI09-09-2020_000074A)

The Bombay High Court on Monday reserved judgment in a plea filed by actor Kangana Ranaut after the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) demolished portions of her bungalow in Bandra.

A Division Bench of justices S.J. Kathawalla and R.I. Chagla on September 9 stayed the process of the demolition. Soon thereafter, affidavits and affidavits in reply were filed by the actor and the civic body. The 33-year-old actor also amended her petition and sought compensation of ₹2 crore from the BMC.

On September 22, the court impleaded Shiv Sena’s chief spokesperson and Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut as a respondent in the petition. This was done after Ms. Ranaut’s advocate Birendra Saraf submitted a DVD containing Mr. Raut’s statements against the actor, which she alleged led to the demolition.

Mr. Saraf had argued, “Ms. Ranaut is at loggerheads with the Maharashtra government over certain issues. She has displeased a party in power with her open views. She had to face life threats and had to seek special protection from the Centre. Sanjay Raut has made derogatory statements against Kangana in TV channels. He said that Kangana needs to be taught a lesson. On the same day when Raut made remarks, an officer from the BMC visited and entered the property without prior notice. The timing of the visit assumes relevance.”

On September 28, the Bench had observed, “There is something absolutely fishy here in the manner in which portions of the bungalow were demolished.”

The BMC has maintained that Ms. Ranaut carried out substantial work of alterations and additions at the building.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.