‘Monster’ review: A juvenile plot which is partly funny

An interesting premise muddled by a weak screenplay makes you less invested in Monster

May 17, 2019 05:53 pm | Updated 05:53 pm IST

S J Suryah in Monster

S J Suryah in Monster

One way to look at Monster is by assuming that it’s targeted at kids and family audiences. After all, it’s been years since we had a movie exclusively for kids ( Naaigal Jaakirathai comes to the mind). If that was the case, Monster works — only partially, though. The film opens with a young Anjanam Azhagiya Pillai (SJ Suryah, in a light-hearted role), a Vallalar follower who practices the precept of not harming any living creature. This is what MK Gandhi professed all his life. Okay, let’s not get political.

When Pillai looks at an ant floating in a water pot, he gently scoops it using a leaf and releases it elsewhere. Cut to the present, Azhagiya Pillai is a 30-something and works with the Electricity Department. He’s single and no one wants to marry him. Reason? He doesn’t own a house. AzhagiyaPillai gets rejected yet again…this time by Mekala (Priya Bhavani Shankar), who would eventually fall in love with him. The initial scenes — boy-meets-girl, followed by a comedy track featuring Karunakaran — can easily be overlooked. That leaves us with the actual drama, when Azhagiya Pillaigets a pricey apartment. Here’s the twist, the house is haunted by a...rodent, which does everything it can to get rid of him.

The premise — about a rodent making an interesting comment about coexistence — looks delicious on paper, but very few ideas get translated on screen. For, Monster is stretched to a point where the scenes written around Azhagiya Pillai and the rat make it convenient for the audience to care less about the movie. The writing is redundant, and the tricks that seemed inventive at first, are reduced to gimmickry. And the sub-plot about a diamond smuggler isn’t convincing and if you remove these portions, it makes no difference to the script.

The bits involving the rodent are genuinely funny (for instance, it devours rusk biscuits) and makes you wonder as to how good Monster could have been. But the film is uneven for the most part, making it an average watch.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.