SEARCH

Sport » Cricket

Updated: April 26, 2013 02:31 IST

Re-think needed on BCCI’s coaching structure

Makarand Waingankar
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  

Sachin Tendulkar is a genius. Need we discuss it? His 40th birthday just past, memoirs of people who saw him ‘gatecrash’ into the Indian team at 16 were heartening to read. What remains crucial is that he isn’t another product of the organised coaching system.

He wasn’t born out of obsessive video analysis by certified coaches. The prankster that he was, he in fact would have made the entire video go missing. His coach Ramakant Achrekar believed in making players out of match practice: ‘Read the situation and learn to deal with it’.

When despite scoring over 2000 runs in a season in 1987, he didn’t get the Junior Cricketer award of the Mumbai Cricket Association, Sunil Gavaskar in a hand written letter to him wrote: “Don’t be disappointed at not getting the Best Junior Cricketer award from MCA. If you look at the past award winners, you will find one name missing and that person has not done badly in Test cricket!” He was talking about himself.

Those who could only make sense of hawk-eyes and drab technology, coaches and former India players alike, boastfully predicted that with his peculiar bottom hand grip, he will be out of the game in a couple of years.

It has been 24 years of the same grip, and Tendulkar plays on. He wasn’t allowed to be the slave of technique by his coach. Had he followed unsolicited technicalities howsoever genuine it seemed, we wouldn’t have witnessed the genius massacre great bowlers time and again.

Having dealt with hundreds of situations in the middle before he played first-class cricket, adaptability was his strength. Not only was he smart from childhood itself in toying with bowlers, he “had that uncanny knack of taking his partner along and attack with venom”, according to Sairaj Bahutule. Bahutule was one of the bowlers bowling to Tendulkar and Kambli in that ever famous partnership of 664 in an inter-school tournament.

Revamping NCA

A few days back the BCCI had a meeting about revamping the National Cricket Academy which has become a rehabilitation centre of contracted players. There were certain decisions taken by the NCA committee, but the fact that mustn’t be overlooked is that most of the national players haven’t come through the NCA.

The list includes Tendulkar, Ganguly, Laxman, Sehwag, Zaheer Khan and so on. They are self-made cricketers who are lucky that the non-qualified experienced coaches didn’t tinker with their natural approach.

The committee took a decision that the fast bowlers will be trained at the MRF Pace Foundation under Glenn McGrath. This arrangement will certainly help young bowlers. During the time Dennis Lillee and T.A. Sekhar were at the MRF, the Board seemed content with Indian coaches.

The BCCI must review the activities of the three centres at Mumbai, Chennai and Mohali. Theses centres train nine associations each.

The technical inputs of state academies, state teams and coaches at these centres are affecting the skill level of players because coaches have agreed to disagree on vital issues. The players resent it as it’s affecting their skill level.

The ideal way would be for the BCCI to insist that all the state academies have the syllabus of NCA so that a uniform coaching language is spoken. The NCA coaches should act as observers.

Why have three separate centres not controlled by NCA when during the season these centres are not  functioning? Instead, there could be five zonal academies which were in operation only during summer till 2005.

With so many standards and so many academies, all we can have is a chaotic mess. Perhaps Tendulkar’s story can give BCCI a hint; techniques and technicalities can create many cricketers but not one Tendulkar. The BCCI has to have a re-think vis-a-vis the coaching structure.

More In: Cricket | Sport

I am sick and tired of reading about Tendulkar. Can you be Tendulkar fatigued? Yes! While I am full of admiration for his longevity and physical fitness, lets stop prostrating before him every time cricket is mentioned. The absurd media hoopla over his 100th hundred was sickening enough. Then his hairstyle change, now this random tribute which has no connection to the subject discussed later..

from:  Subbu
Posted on: Apr 26, 2013 at 13:21 IST

Great article Mr.Waingankar as you have mentioned clearly that most of
the legends in Indian cricket haven't been to any of the coaching
academies in the past and infact none exsisted before all they had was
probably a coach who did not play at the highest level. The most one
ever played was Ranji trophy despite the standard which they played
managed to produce cricketers who went on to become great players in
world cricket. The reason for becoming such great cricketers that they
haven't tampered with their technique or grip and made them play a lot
of matches which help them immensely in developing their mental
attitude and toughness.The exposure gained has only enhanced their
concentration and confidence levels which has helped them in the
higher leagues. With NCA being established in every state should
rethink and plan in a more systematic coaching structure not hampering
the natural flair and approach of a cricketer. This will help them a
great deal in the long run.

from:  Noel Bernard Carr
Posted on: Apr 26, 2013 at 05:09 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Listen to The Hindu's Sports Editor Nirmal Shekar speak to our Sports-Writer Arun Venugopal on India's showing at the Commonweath Games — with a guest appearance by golden girl Dipika Pallikal — India's tour of England, the Jadeja-Anderson controversy and more....Listen in »

Tennis

Football

Races



O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Cricket

Duleep Trophy: It will be Central’s bowlers vs. North’s batsmen

Missing Diwali at home is a part of the profession for modern-day cricketers. Those participating in the Duleep Trophy semifinal contest... »