What was done effortlessly by a fifth grader in the U.K. needed a commerce graduate in India!
We often hear two contrasting views on the employment scenario. On the one hand, employers cry hoarse about non-availability of talent in the market and, on the other, we hear about millions of youth who are unable to find a well-paid job several years after completing engineering or other professional degrees. A recent survey suggests that over 70 per cent of the engineering graduates in India are unemployable. What ails these graduates or the so-called degree holders? Why are they not suitable for employment?
Let us understand what is meant by suitability for employment. I was transitioning a business process of a large U.K. bank to our office in Chennai during my stint with a large IT company. The process was quite simple. The bank had developed a system for analysing the financial statements of borrowers. The numbers had to be extracted from the statements submitted based on some simple rules and input into the system. The system would process the data and generate the borrower's creditworthiness in the form of a business grade. This business grade was used by the bank's relationship managers to arrive at the credit limit for the borrower or to decide whether to lend him at all.
As part of the transition process, I wanted to know the qualifications and the skill sets of the resources. The bank's project manager told me that some of the resources had completed their tenth grade and most of them were fifth graders. In India, I knew for sure that we would hire very bright commerce and accounting graduates for this process.
This is the big difference. What was being done effortlessly by a fifth grader in the U.K. needed a commerce graduate in India. And, I can't imagine a resource that has passed standard V doing this work in India. It is definitely not the question of thousands of graduates being available in the job market for taking up this job. Corporates will be more than willing to have less qualified resources for doing the job if they can deliver because that would mean a lesser salary burden. We simply cannot train a fifth grader to perform these tasks. In fact, if truth be told, even after hiring some of the brightest minds we barely managed to survive the transition pressures measured by stringent performance criteria.
Does that mean a fifth grader in the U.K. is equivalent to a graduate in India? That is also not true. It is because the Indian education system is inherently flawed due to imperfect delivery of the curricula, an archaic examination system, shortage of skilled teachers, inadequate supplementary reading and the student's inability to correlate theory and practice. “Education does not consist of passing examinations or knowing English or mathematics. It is a mental state,” said Jawaharlal Nehru. In summary, we miserably fail to elevate the thinking capacity and increase the breadth of faculty of the students while imparting education. This failure is deep-rooted and starts right from primary schools and gets compounded at institutes of higher learning.
Residual talent
Of all these issues, I would pick the shortage of quality teachers as the wrecker-in-chief. The reason is quite simple. The teaching profession, barring a few passionate individuals in the IITs, IIMs and some private institutions, is a job for the residual talent in the employment market.
The best engineering talent goes to the U.S. for higher studies and the cream of what remains is hired by the large corporates. After the small and medium enterprises complete the trawling, the leftover is looking for alternative sources of employment. Some of these people park themselves temporarily in teaching professions in private colleges or software training institutes. Over the next few months, they equip themselves with the requisite skills and look for opportunities in the mainstream employment market unless there are compelling reasons to stick to their current job.
There is nothing wrong in this approach because it would be embarrassing for a person to see his students earning two or three times his monthly salary coupled with frequent trips to foreign lands. I may sound blasphemous here, but the reality is we are left with teachers who continue in the teaching profession just because they are not able to find a job elsewhere. It is well-nigh impossible for these resources to inspire the student community in a graduate / postgraduate course. This is a sad and bitter truth confronting the education sector today.
Reading habit
I would also like to touch upon the issue of supplementary reading with a specific example. Gandhiji, during his days in England for his bar-at-law course, meets a person called Fredrick Pincutt. This meeting is sought by Gandhiji himself to ascertain his readiness for practising law. In Pincutt's evaluation, Gandhiji's general reading was very meagre. He says every Indian should know Indian history in detail. He also tells Gandhiji that although this has no connection with the practice of law, he ought to know this because knowledge of the world is a sine qua non for a lawyer. This will help him read a man's character from his face. Pincutt was also surprised that Gandhiji had not read about the First War of Indian Independence. Gandhiji immediately realises the importance of what Pincutt said and humbly accepts that he has not had much supplementary reading.
The reason for highlighting this incident from the Mahatma's autobiography is to emphasise the importance of cultivating the reading habit at a very young age to be successful in life.
I have another anecdote from my U.K. transition experience. We were designing an IT infrastructure to move scanned documents offshore and enable the processing through a workflow system. It was a complex project and we were interacting with a senior software developer to put the design together. He was around 30 and, in my opinion, one of the best software designers that money could buy. Curiosity got the better of me one day and I wanted to know his educational background. He told me that he had completed eighth grade in South Africa and migrated to the U.K. in search of employment. He was working as a courier boy for a year when he underwent software training and built his design skills. I was startled, to say the least. My team of two engineering graduates with three to four years of experience between them was no match for him. There are several such examples I can quote. None of the project managers and senior people that I met during the next two years was a college graduate.
Even after completing the transition, we were struggling to train the floor resources on Management Information (MI) and state-of-the-nation reports. The West had moved forward rapidly in operations management practices and our skill sets were woefully inadequate even for the catch-up work. And we had the floor overflowing with cost and chartered accountants, engineers and management graduates.
I am not trying to build a case for discontinuing our education methodology. Our method of teaching has the highest success percentage in the world in building literacy among people. The West has paid a heavy price for not paying attention to the delivery of education in society. My worry is we are bringing in a kind of under-employment where people do work that is much below the skill sets they are supposed to have. These resources will not be able to go up the corporate ladder and it will be very difficult to give them a career path. Ideally, we would want these graduates to upskill themselves and move up the value chain so that they don't become redundant. The government and society at large have to wake up to the reality that one day an African country might become the world's back office and IT hub and do to us what Bangalore or Chennai did to the western world. Before that, we have to make sure that our education system gets upgraded suitably and can mass produce well-rounded personalities who can take India on the path of glory.
(The writer's email is murali.pasupathy@naethra.com)
Keywords: education issues, graduates, IT employees

A well documented, thought-provoking article. I am born in the mid 80's era and being an IT grad, I now turn back and see the track I have continued my journey so far. The subject of "Social Science" (to that matter, any other subject) in my school days was considered as a mere time to sleep in class hours. I dont disagree with the education system in India. It should be supplemented. I'm currently in UK as part of an overseas assignment and took my time outside my work. I can see the difference between the education system my neighbor's kid undergo here and my cousin's kid back home in India. I bet though my cousin's kid is ranking no.1 among his mates in his class, he can't be compared with the "thinking capacity" and the IQ of my neighbor kid (and her mates) has in UK here. I asked myself - If i asked my mom/dad any "Why/what/who/when/how" questions this is the reply I got those days - "shut up and do what you are asked to do". Let future parents like us not be like that to our kids
Qualification for employment varies from country to country and more so from individual to individual. We have different priorities. Education is not always a passport for employment. Aptitude and ambition are important. Our environment and living conditions in India are totally different from UK. To read to improve knowledge is certainly very important. It must start from childhood. Parents should encourage them. It should be part of the school curriculum, besides their regular text books. Their skills in speaking, reading and above all writing should be developed. These are essentials for employability.
Good article. What the author intends to convey is that a 5th grader in the West is given a greater opportunity to think than an Indian student who would perhaps relate information from whatever he has memorised in the classroom. I too have interviewed the so called "MBA" from many of the Universities in the South and find that more than 60% of the students lack the knowledge of a MBA. In fact many of them do not even have the capacity to explain their "project". Essentially this is because the Teachers do not give any importance to this activity. Students do not go about the process for their projects. They either copy it from some of their friends in other institutes or get it done from the “WEB”. The net result is that the student lacks the knowledge and hence is not able to make an impression on the interviewer thus costing him the job. Today in many of the Software Organisations you will meet personnel who cannot even draft a proper mail to his counterpart in the West.
In India a person is rated successful by his annual income is it the right way to judge and thats the sole cause of such problems in countries like India nobody will go for jobs less rated in society so the cause for unemployment every engg wants that his salary starts at fews lacs per annum and that too with an office to sit and orders to work is this what a real engg looks like i think what metro man Mr.Shreedharan said in an interview was quiet correct that we produce the mass but not the quality of engg that is required .
Author is doing a grave mistake of mixing education with livelihood earning skills. I am not saying that we have good education system in India. If a person becomes "Life Positive", that person will naturally use his God given capability to earn living.
There is a lot of truth in this article. There is a paucity of wide reading in the Indian youth and the emphasis is on achieving a good score in all exams. However there is a deeper problem that stems from history of India, the colonisation and the 'Indian environment'. If you take the same graduate and put him or her in a Western environment and they will flourish. Saying that we see examples of young Indians making to the International stage but this number is still very small compared to the Indians who have imigrated to the west. This imbalance will change only if the Indian environment changes. The majority of our political leaders are still illiterate. We are a democracy but we have goondas,thugs and mafia as leaders. Enormous financial incentive governs entry into politics. The educated shun politics and this environment should change.
Assuming that there are no cultural issues (or that everything is fine as far as culture is concerned at IT industry), In this article,the authors' main worry was that we are a kind of encouraging underemployement in India. In this situation, there are two possible outcomes - move up the value chain or reduce the educational standards. Unfortuately, our epitome of educational standards - the IIT brilliants like NRN - could think of only creating body-shops that does not require any great educational achievement in reality - resulting in underemployment. When I graduated from CEG, INfosys declared that they would recruit graduates from other disciplines also (like mech) but with marks above 75%...only three of us were there in my mech batch with that kind of percentile and all three of us decided to abstain thinking why coding..but now they are recruiting enmasse entire batches... so they recruit 10th pass outs also in future...
In India, majority of parents are in a misconception that, supplementary reading or a kind of overall development activities are detractors to main stream studies. Unless parents understand the importance of creative way of raising a child, India would have to face the challenges that author has mentioned.
The society here in India focuses more on getting the first class in graduation and working for a MNC, sadly it has trickled down to the kids line of thought today. We have an infatuation with education which is not satiated without getting a fancy degree. Probably after the 1980s the basic sciences has died; I still felt that my physics and mathematics professors were people who had the zest in the subject. Today I have people who talk .net or any technology at my office but do not know how to change a tyre or start a car with jumper cables. That's the sorry situation we live in. I can totally agree with Mr Murali and I too had a similar experiences, when I joined second job in California my project manager was a high school graduate(10+2), but she knew how to deliver well within the allocated budget and with the best quality standards, this would never have happened in India. We need a paradigm shift in the way we think and start seeing things with a practical perspective.
I am a doctor and most of the people around me fit the description which has been made out in this article. Nobody wants to read or understand things beyond the prescribed syllabi. They would rather spend time watching some family feud filled sob story on the TV.Reading books outside the syllabus is a definite no no. Be happy if they actually manage to read the syllabus. Ask some trivia regarding india like say what are the seven sisters and they would be probably wondering how the girl's parents would manage to marry all of them off. We once had a function at home where the priest drew the swastika and this person actually asked why we are painting our house with nazi symbols. there is no sense of pride in anything indian. There is no sense of purpose in life. Exceptions to these observations are few and far between. i completely agree with the author
Though I agree with most of the authors comment but I believe he has missed a very important point here-which also is a major difference between India and developed nations-that educational disadvantage is born not at school but in the home.Learning begins at birth and is fostered by a loving, secure, stimulating environment. Not well to do Indian families may provide a loving and stimulating environment but it may not necessarily be secure. Another thing is that the biggest educational advantage is due obviously to the socio-economic background of the child and how well-educated his parents are. In this front as well, we are lagging behind our developed peers. So in a nutshell Indian educational system, with all it's strengths and weaknesses, may not be the perfect education system in the world but surely is not the only thing that is to be blamed for the poor employ-ability of our graduates. We need reforms in our educational system but we have to keep in mind other factors as well.
Hello,
Having worked in banking for several years outside of India, I dont know of any bank that hires fifth and tenth graders for any job other than janitors? Where does this bank exist!! or does it exist. Perhaps, you mistook a jest to be a fact.
Absolutely agree with the author in every detail. I've worked with quite a few Grads from top Indian institutes but always disappointed as their knowledge revolved only around text books. We lack the basic smartness to challenge a situation. A 15-17 year old student from India stands no chance against a bright year5 student raised in UK's educational system. We seriously lack supplementary reading as we are ruining our kids time with endless mega serials between 6-10PM. In UK supplementary reading is as important as the rest of curriculum. Our text book educational system can churn out degree/PG holders but can never produce the quality required for competitiveness. Education is just not attending school for 220 days in a year and passing certain examination, it is a process of developing skills of an individual to overcome challenges smartly. Our teaching methodology needs to be modernized without any political interference. Reforming Indian education will be a long tardy process
went through the article. point made by the writer may not be wrong; but is it relevant to our situation. Our fifth graders would not be adults; their strength would run into a gigantic number; we would use our known methods of elimination--- entrance test, income criteria, reservations,sons of the soil policy etc. etc. Parents would send their children to : the course pursued gets a paying job, the course pursued ensures good employability, the course pursued is tailor made in that learning is not creative based, the course pursued gets the student a valid degree/diploma with recognisable stakes in the matrimonial market as also going abroad eg. USA or UK or EUROPE.
A brilliant article - I'd say - make all A rated Engineering colleges autonomous - this gives them the ability to at least bring their syllabus up to date. As an Engineering graduate I can tell you - teachers would be great - but not really a limiting factor - good student's will learn the same from a text book - just give them the room and freedom to study what they want and what will be useful. In Mumbai University - 80 percent of a student's time is wasted in archaic submissions - this exercise is entirely without merit and does not add one bit to the student's industrial capability. There is also a depressing lack of internships. Student's should be required to complete internships in the real world. This gives invaluable insight and learning that is never possible in a classroom.
How employable are our graduates? The article provided interesting reading and the topic has been well analyzed. It is true that several teachers today are not a dedicated lot. If we go deeper still, we find that the salary of a teacher is much less than that of IT professionals and some other jobs which do not deal with human beings. The teachers deal with raw human machinery and not mechanical ones. They need greater skill and more effort to shape the young ones, which is no easy task. Those who are passionate about teaching are forced to leave the profession for want of more monetary benefits. Hence the government needs to pay the teachers more, for them to turn out employable graduates with the necessary technical knowledge and the required soft skills.
I'm a 2nd year B.E student from a renowned college and still i see a dearth of resources in my campus.We here, frequently discuss the methods of improving the skills of ourselves but still i feel guidance is the most important thing we lack here. And most importantly, i truly agree wid ur comment that we all lack a supplementary reading habbit.
Yes ! the imparting of education is in need of drastic changes. Our information technology students appear for several Microsoft Certified Professional ( MCP)exams online and get the credentials online also. But the Dept of Govt Exams is expecting the students to go for six months manual typing (in some typewriting institutes) and appear for exams to get Junior Typist certificate (40 words per minute) whereas in US millions of houses have typing tutor softwares in their home PCs and finish keyboarding skill test online and print the certificate sitting at home. This certificate is valid in a job interview. In spite of repeatedly bringing to the attention of the Govt nobody is bothered because some vested lobby (maybe association of typewriting institutes)is still clinging to the IX century manual typewriters in India.
We ourselves know as to where the present-day education system in India stands. What is required is a change in the approach being taken by all the stake-holders in the current education system. One person or one institution cannot change any deeply-rooted menace in this system. At the same time comparing ourselves with the West is also not correct. Is the corporate world in India,the same,from 1947 to 2011 ? We now see people from all walks of life in the corporate world. That is an improvement when compared to the 1980's, though the improvement is not major. Just a law cannot make everything. There should be a continuous improvement in each person; only then the difference will be observable.
As we know to run a steam engine on the track there should be requirement of efficient fuel in a regular way ,as comparing to the european to indians we have less fuel from the past effect ,to tackle the situation of study out come ,a concrete structure should be required which has to be made by government and to forcefully allowed in in school to differentiate each child ability and to develop metal ability to fight in the worst Indian employment race.
I agree with most of what the author says and the issue is quite complicated. Reading and learning is missing from the lives of many youngsters - they are just hopping from one coaching institute to another to crack some exam or interview. Unfortunately, people who have these 'good qualities' may sometimes be overlooked by the selectors as compared to the 'coached' ones. Many big companies have in fact a very superficial selection process. On the other hand, I know many graduates with exceptional skills or intelligence getting frustrated with jobs that pay very well but which do not need anything more than what a fifth grader can do!
We should realise that our education system is designed to produce only clerks and technicians. Despite 60 years of independence we are still implementing the education system designed by the British.It is high time that we develop an education system that is suited to our supple and flexible intelligence.The Indians are one of the most intelligent people in the world and require an educational system that can harness their intelligence and creativity and make India an intelligence superpower.
This process of change should begin at school level when children are at their formative stage of development and continue throughout their life. Children should be encouraged to read books in their mother tongue about the Indian culture, traditions,historic figures,literature and the arts.They should be taught to have a scientific attitude in dealing with issues. Children should be taught to be defiant of any authorities or precedents and be taught to think independently and boldly.
Even I do agree with
Even though it's a private observation, it's nonetheless an observation and the author has given his thoughts on how this problem can be observed. The West has progressed for many varied reasons, colonisation being one of them. This alone has not sustained their economy, but an investment into basic things like education, health, infrastructure whereas a country like ours have only concentrated pockets of it in metro cities. It's upto the lawmakers and people in which direction it moves. A few people working for fancy IT companies churning billable hours to work for another's economy does not truly reflect a country's progress.
In India, would ANY corporate etc. hire a person who has finished class 8 and has no formal degree? Get real, Indian corporates expect you to have a degree to do the most menial of tasks, the degree matters, not the skill / training.
Graduate's unemployment problems do not arise because of the teaching process.It is in the hands of the student and the knowledge that he gains comes from his own type of learning.Nowadays,even the talented graduates are not employed.That does not mean that he/she is not a capable one.I attended an interview few days back where the Group Discussion was the first round.Some of the people who spoke well were not selected,whereas the students who were dumb during the Group Discussion were selected.What does this mean?The students were not even looked by the HR while speaking.Thus the capable graduates who are unemployed are not so because of their limited talent,but because of luck.Companies should change their selection procedure and be honest while selecting.
As far as Indian education is concerned the method of rote-learning should be blamed.Students are working under pressure and their only aim is to achieve good scores .This learning process is absolutely not a panaceae for skill shortage in the employment sector.On the other hand children should be guided according to their aptitude or innate skills to excel in their on career and the problem of escalating figures of engineers without necessary skills can be curtailed.
"What was done effortlessly by a fifth grader in the U.K. needed a
commerce graduate in India!"
Is it really true? What is the salary of a fifth grader of U.K.
compared to an Indian commerce graduate? I am very sure that the
fifth grader might be getting at least ten times more than the
Indian commerce graduate.
If for any reason you feel that you are less than a fifth grader of
U.K, you can post if on your personal webpage, blog or website, you
should not generalize it for all Indian.
Aboslutely wonderful article!
Being a fourth year computer engineering student, i cmpltly relate to
the points mentioned here, we students have similar discussions amongst
ourselves too.
Let us not blame the system and the Faculty members alone.Most of the students in the tier two and three studies pursue engineering ,as they are compelled by their parents.Expecting them reading books is a distant dream,they dont even read the news paper. English still continues to be a foreign language ,which retards their growth and understanding.The proliferation of private engineering colleges and universities have only deteriorated the system.
I am in conformity with you regarding the standards of our graduates.The problem lies with the learning process right from the school where the teachers concentrate in getting the student get through the examination but not on imparting knowledge.Further no efforts to imbibe the habit of reading books other than the syllabus, are being taken.further the teaching standards of teachers especially in rural areas need to be reviewed.The industry should take the fresh graduates and train them to suit to their needs.Please recall the opinion expressed by Sri.Narayana Murthy EX.Chairman Infosys in this context.
It is so unfair to India amd Indians to make such a generalisation that Indians are duffers and Europeans are experts, based on one person's private experience in the west. I wonder how Europeans will perform if they are asked to perform in an Indian context, according to Indian epistemological principles, especially in an Indian language with a typically Indian welanschauung. Perhaps much more miserably! It is possible, of couurse, tha in India, education has perhaps degenerated into mere schooling involving theoretical memorisation of information presented by teachers with the sole intention of obtaining good grades in the examinations.
Very rightly said Mr.Murali , may this be the eye opener for rest of India !!! Jai Hind.
Ismail
s., in india they only look at the degree what you have... the teaching and the placement mode to be changed.. if they see a person, who has changed his department (from science to commerce or to management) the companies refuse to take cos he is not in d same stream from the starting. if they see a gap in his academic path they refuse to give employment.. these are all sillies and old fashioned....
the companies should look for the skills., instead of seeing the 10, 12th standard mark sheets for the post graduate employee.. his school life may not be much interesting but he may hv developed interest in later part..
the recruitment in india must b matured and result focused..
If the graduates are unemployable, the problem lies with obsolete syllabus and teaching- learning process? What does industry want from fresh graduates? Can' it train new recruits in probation according to its needs? Are we forcing one and all into engineering at the cost of other disciplines? perhaps, it has become fashionable to say that only thirty percent of the graduates are employable. Graduates are given general skills and every industry has ti train them to their specific needs.
Broadly I agree with this. But certain issues need clarification. Education is compulsory in the UK until the age of 16. It is therefore unlikely there are many 5th grade passers in employment. If they were children, they cannot be in employment (by law).
The cream of the Indian graduates are the cream anywhere. But the education system and employability of graduates is a reflection of economic insecurity, adversity to risk taking by employers/authorities and lack of initiative and leadership. There has to be a complete overhaul. No quick fixes here.
Please Email the Editor