Will the BCCI Apex Council interpret certain clauses differently ?

The Justice Lodha Reforms in Cricket Report has only said that cricketing matters would be dealt with by cricketers.

October 21, 2019 03:11 am | Updated 03:11 am IST - Mumbai

Will the BCCI Secretary-elect Jay Shah, be allowed to convene the senior selection committee meeting to pick the Indian teams for the Twenty20 and Test series against Bangladesh?

Will the BCCI Secretary-elect Jay Shah, be allowed to convene the senior selection committee meeting to pick the Indian teams for the Twenty20 and Test series against Bangladesh?

Will the BCCI Secretary-elect Jay Shah, be allowed to convene the senior selection committee meeting to pick the Indian teams for the Twenty20 and Test series against Bangladesh?

According to veteran BCCI administrators, the Supreme Court appointed Committee of Administrtors (CoA) loosely applied the BCCI Constitution to deprive the Secretary of convening the selection committee meetings prior to the Indian team’s tour of the West Indies.

Since this July the Chairpersons of the selection committees — senior, junior and women — have been entrusted with the responsibility of even convening the selection committee meetings.

The Justice Lodha Reforms in Cricket Report has only said that cricketing matters would be dealt with by cricketers, but did not say that the secretary cannot convene selection committee meetings. It has been a long-standing convention and it’s the secretary, who after ascertaining the fitness reports from the specialists attached to the team, conveys the same to the selection committee.

CoA directive

According to the CoA directive, the Chairperson of the Selection Committee has to maintain an accurate record of the meetings and mail it to the Secretary.

The BCCI President elect, Sourav Ganguly, has not minced words while interacting with the media that it’s been like an emergency situation in the last three years, that the Apex Council has to look at decisions taken by the CoA in order to restore normality in the functioning of the BCCI.

The CoA decision to not to allow the three office bearers to attend the AGM — C.K. Khanna (acting president), Amitabh Choudhary (acting secretary) and Anirudh Chaudhry (treasurer) has not gone down well with BCCI members. The treasurer Chaudhry has signed the accounts of the last two years (2016-17, 2017-18), under protest.

While the Electoral Officer N. Gopalaswami has allowed the representatives of Services, Railways and All India Universities to attend the AGM and allowed replacements for Uttar Pradesh and Manipur, the CoA has allowed Maharastra to attend the AGM without voting rights, but has kept the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association and Haryana Cricket Association out of the AGM.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.