Corrections and clarifications — November 9, 2020

November 09, 2020 12:02 am | Updated 01:18 am IST

In the report headlined “SC relief for Arnab in privilege case” (November 7, 2020) it was wrongly stated that the contempt notice had been issued to the Secretary , Maharashtra Legislative Assembly . Though the SC order, says the letter, contents of which have been held to be contemptuous, originates from the office of the Secretary, the contempt notice has been issued to the Assistant Secretary , Vilas Athawale , who is the author of the letter. The excerpt from the court order said: “We, therefore, issue notice returnable on 23.11.2020 to Mr. Vilas Athawale, Assistant Secretary, Maharashtra Vidhan Mandal Sachivalaya, to show cause why he should not be proceeded against for contempt of this Court in exercise of our powers under Article 129 of the Constitution of India.”

The pointer in the Open Page (Sunday Magazine, November 8, 2020) to the online article “Language and equity” has gone with a wrong byline. It should have been Pranava Manjari N. and not Swati Bisht .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.