Ayodhya verdict: All you need to know

U.P. Sunni Waqf Board not to file review plea in Ayodhya case

Still undecided on whether to accept 5 acres offered to it for construction of a mosque in Ayodhya, it says.

The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board on Tuesday said it was still undecided on whether to accept 5 acres offered to it for the construction of a mosque in Ayodhya as per the verdict of the Supreme Court in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case.

The board, however, reiterated its stand expressed on November 9 that it will not go in for any review of the verdict, under which the court directed the Central government to form a Trust within three months for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya.

A decision on 5 acres was “still in the consideration of the board,” its chairman Zufar Faruqi said here after a meeting.

“The members of the board have asked for more time to formulate their views. As and when a decision is taken, it shall be communicated separately,” he said.

Six out of seven members of the board voted in favour of the decision to not challenge the verdict. Dissenting member Abdur Razzaque Khan was in favour of filing a review petition. 

Another member Imran Mabood Khan, who has publicly favoured a review petition, did not attend the meeting.

Mr. Faruqi stressed that the board did not demand 5 acres in Ayodhya and had no role to play in the debate over it.

To a query of journalists on the logic behind the decision to not file a review petition, he said it was based on the board's earlier stated public stand that “we would accept whatever verdict the Supreme Court delivered, even if it went against us.”

When asked to respond to allegations by some petitioners that the Board ruled out filing a review petition due to CBI pressure, he said, “None of the petitioners said this to me. If they have told you, you can go and ask them.”

The The Home Department, headed by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, in October, right before the conclusion of the hearing in the Ayodhya case, recommended a CBI probe into the “irregular” sale, purchase and transfer of Waqf land by the Sunni Central Waqf Board and the Shia Central Waqf Board. 

In the case of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, it recently not only declined to accept 5 acres in Ayodhya but also decided to file a review petition. The “restitution by granting 5 acres where fundamental values have been damaged to the extent of causing national shame, will not in any manner heal the wounds caused,” it said on November 17 after a meeting of its working committee chaired by president Maulana Sayyad Mohammad Rabe Hassani Nadwi.

Why you should pay for quality journalism - Click to know more

Related Topics
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Feb 25, 2020 5:06:43 PM | https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/up-sunni-waqf-board-will-not-file-review-petition-in-ayodhya-title-dispute/article30086985.ece

In This Package
Ayodhya verdict: 40 prominent persons file joint review plea
Four fresh review pleas filed in Ayodhya case
Sacked from Ayodhya case, says Muslim parties’ lawyer
Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind files review plea in Ayodhya case
Ayodhya verdict: Muslim Personal Law Board to file review petition
You are reading
U.P. Sunni Waqf Board not to file review plea in Ayodhya case
Krishna temple (left) and Shahi Idgah (right) exist side by side. Security camps were added following the demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992.
What does the Places of Worship Act protect?
Ayodhya land exempted in Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act: Supreme Court
File photo of stone carving on pillars, slabs and bricks at Shri Ram Janam Bhumi Trust workshop in Ayodhya
Ayodhya verdict | Can court ask a secular State to construct a temple?
People react after Supreme Court's historic verdict on the Ayodhya land case, in Jaipur, on November 9, 2019.
Ayodhya verdict | Ruins don’t always indicate demolition, observes Supreme Court
Ayodhya verdict | Supreme Court not to entertain claims against actions of Mughals
Ayodhya verdict | Temple at disputed site, alternative land for mosque, rules Supreme Court
Supreme Court's judgment in Ayodhya case: reactions
Ayodhya: How a religious issue became a political hot potato
Ayodhya verdict | Supreme Court agrees Muslims were wronged but allows Ram temple
Ayodhya verdict quashes claim of ‘land as a legal entity’
Ayodhya verdict | Addendum quotes Tulsidas, Ain-i-Akbari for birthplace proof
People react after Supreme Court's historic verdict on the Ayodhya land case, in Jaipur, on November 9, 2019.
Ayodhya verdict | Sunni Waqf Board not to seek review of judgment
Time to celebrate: Residents lit firecrackers in Ayodhya on Saturday after the Supreme Coourt delivered the verdict.
Ayodhya split on predictable lines
Ayodhya verdict | Vindicated by unanimous verdict, says L. K. Advani
Ayodhya verdict | Unimpeded right in outer courtyard wins whole site for Hindus
Ayodhya verdict | Constitution can resolve knotty issues, says Modi
When did the dispute over Ram Janmabhoomi start, and why did it take so long for a resolution?
Highlights of the Ayodhya verdict
Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute: The story so far
Ayodhya title dispute: A quick recap of the final hearings
Ayodhya verdict: decoding Allahabad HC's nine-year-old majority judgment under challenge in SC
Ayodhya verdict: as it happened | Temple at disputed site, alternative land for mosque, says Supreme Court
File photo of stone carving on pillars, slabs and bricks at Shri Ram Janam Bhumi Trust workshop in Ayodhya, for a possible temple at the disputed site.
A chronology of the Ayodhya dispute
What are the Ayodhya appeals all about?
Chronology of Ayodhya case
Timeline: Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute
Next Story