HC gives no relief to suspended DSP Praneeth Rao in phone tapping case

The Punjagutta police registered a criminal case against him following a complaint lodged by his superior officer Ramesh, an officer of Additional Superintendent of Police with the SIB, stating that Praneeth “developed profiles of unidentified persons and tracked them using 17 computers with dedicated Internet lines”.

March 22, 2024 05:13 am | Updated 05:13 am IST - Hyderabad

Justice G. Radha Rani of Telangana High Court on March 21 dismissed the criminal revision case filed by arrested police officer Dugyala Praneeth Kumar, challenging the lower court order connected to his arrest.

The arguments in the petition filed by Praneeth Kumar, also known as Praneeth Rao, who is facing multiple charges including criminal breach of trust, were concluded the previous day. Praneeth Kumar was accused of operating clandestinely from the office of the Special Intelligence Branch (SIB) constituted to gather information about Left Wing Extremist operatives, at Begumpet in Hyderabad.

The Punjagutta police registered a criminal case against him following a complaint lodged by his superior officer Ramesh, an officer of Additional Superintendent of Police with the SIB, stating that Praneeth “developed profiles of unidentified persons and tracked them using 17 computers with dedicated Internet lines”. By then, Praneeth was shifted to Siricialla district, 140 km from Hyderabad, as part of general transfers affected across the State.

Subsequently, a Special Investigation Team headed by Jubilee Hills ACP P. Venkatagiri arrested him from Siricilla and presented him before a local magistrate here in Hyderabad. The magistrate initially remanded him in judicial custody and eventually gave him to police custody for further investigation. The arrested police officer knocked the doors of the HC stating that he was being interrogated consecutively for several hours without a break.

He sought a direction to stay the order of the lower court citing different grounds. The investigators were selectively leaking information about the interrogation and the case to the press to malign him, his counsel contended before the bench of Justice Radha Rani. He said that Additional SP Ramesh was also present during interrogation, which was against the rules. After conclusion of the arguments the previous day, the judge on Thursday dismissed the petition.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.