Thoothukudi police firing | DSP, three constables suspended

Explanation sought from senior officers involved in the incident

Updated - October 22, 2022 12:01 pm IST

Published - October 21, 2022 08:38 pm IST - CHENNAI

The Aruna Jagadeesan Commission found excesses on the part of several police personnel in the May 22, 2018 firing, which left 13 anti-Sterlite protesters dead. Photo: Special Arrangement

The Aruna Jagadeesan Commission found excesses on the part of several police personnel in the May 22, 2018 firing, which left 13 anti-Sterlite protesters dead. Photo: Special Arrangement

The Tamil Nadu government has suspended a Deputy Superintendent of Police and three police constables in connection with the May 2018 police firing in Thoothukudi which claimed 13 lives.

A couple of days after the Aruna Jagadeesan Commission’s report was tabled in the Assembly, the Home Secretary ordered the suspension of DSP Thirumalai and others. An explanation was sought from senior police officers as to why appropriate disciplinary action should not be taken against them, police sources said.

Also Read | Charges framed against 3 revenue officials following Aruna Jagadeesan Commission report

The Commission found excesses on the part of several police personnel in the firing which left 13 anti-Sterlite protesters dead.

The report named 17 police officers, including the then Inspector-General of Police (South Zone), Shailesh Kumar Yadav, the then Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Kapil Kumar C. Saratkar, the then Thoothukudi Superintendent of Police, P. Mahendran, the then Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lingathirumaran, and the then inspectors, Thirumalai, Hariharan and Parthiban.

Legal opinion

According to a senior police officer, the government would take legal opinion on further action against the police officers named in the report.

“The Central Bureau of Investigation has already investigated the case and filed the charge-sheet. The Commission’s report is only a set of recommendations which the government will consider on merit. The further course of action will depend on the explanations received from the officers named in the report,” a top ranking police officer told The Hindu on Friday.

However, in March this year, the Anti-Sterlite People’s Movement expressed concern that the central investigating agency had not charge-sheeted police personnel involved in the firing.

It argued that the CBI had filed a charge-sheet against 101 people who protested against the Sterlite copper unit in Thoothukudi. But even after four years, a charge-sheet was not filed against the police personnel involved in the firing.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.