We will ensure reservation for Vanniyars, says Stalin

Discussions with legal experts will be held, says the Chief Minister

Published - April 07, 2022 03:44 pm IST - CHENNAI

 Chief Minister M.K. Stalin addressing the people after inaugurating new projects in Villupuram district recently.

Chief Minister M.K. Stalin addressing the people after inaugurating new projects in Villupuram district recently. | Photo Credit: S.S. KUMAR

Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Thursday told the Legislative Assembly that the DMK government would ensure 10.5% internal reservation for Vanniyars in the similar manner it had achieved 7.5% reservation for government school students in professional courses.

“The Supreme Court has clearly said that the Assembly and the State government has powers (for enacting law on quota),” he said while responding to a calling attention motion moved by the PMK, Congress, and the Tamizhaga Vazhurimai Katchi founder T. Velimurugan.

The Chief Minister said he was not ready to go into the issue that “the reservation is temporary” since it was an important issue of Tamil Nadu’s social justice and special reservation. “We will hold discussions with legal experts and certainly uphold social justice,” he added.

Rejecting the allegation of former Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami that the government lost the case because it had failed to engage good lawyers, Mr. Stalin said senior counsels Rakesh Dwivedi, Abishek Manu Singhvi, Mukul Rohatgi and P. Wilson effectively made the arguments on behalf of the government.

“The court has placed on record its appreciation for the work of the advocates,” he said.

Mr. Stalin said though the AIADMK government introduced the reservation for the Vanniyars, the DMK government argued the case seriously since it was the DMK government that announced 20% reservation for the Most Backward Classes.

Alleging that the reservation for the Vanniyars were introduced in a hurried manner, he said the ordinance was issued in 2021 though the reservation was recommended in 2012 itself.

“It was issued half-an-hour before the code of conduct for the Assembly election came into force. The hurried manner in which it was introduced led to the High Court and the Supreme Court deciding against it,” he explained.

Recalling the Supreme court’s observation that, “we find that the government has committed an error”, he said there was no need to say who headed that government. “I do not like to join issues with anyone by referring to the other shortcomings pointed out by the court,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.