Madras High Court sets aside eviction proceedings initiated against Vanniar Sangam

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy say State government cannot be permitted to initiate the proceedings when there are competing claims over the title of the property

Published - November 07, 2023 09:22 pm IST - CHENNAI

The Madras High Court on Tuesday set aside the eviction proceedings initiated by Pallavaram Taluk Tahsildar against Vanniar Sangam which had constructed a building, used as a hostel, on 41,952 sq.ft., of land at St. Thomas Mount in Chennai.

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy quashed the Tahsildar’s March 6, 2023 proceedings under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 since there was no conclusive proof of the land belonging to the State government.

The judges pointed out the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) department and the Cantonment Board had made rival claims of ownership over the land and hence it would be improper to permit the revenue department to proceed with the eviction proceedings.

Senior counsel N.L. Rajah, representing Vanniar Sangam, had told the court it had purchased the property in 1992 from an individual who had obtained it on lease from Vadapalani Kasi Viswanathar Temple in 1979. Therefore, he claimed the writ petitioner was the rightful owner.

On the other hand, Special Government Pleader N.R.R. Arun Natarajan told the court the HR&CE department had filed a civil suit against Vanniar Sangam and obtained an ex-parte decree. He said, even execution proceedings had been initiated to recover the property.

Making things more complicated, advocate Chevanan Mohan, representing the Cantonment Board, claimed before the court that the land was actually a part of a much larger extent of 2,914 acres which had been notified as St. Thomas Mount and Pallavaram cantonment.

Mr. Mohan also stated the land had been categorised as B2 property which continued to be under the management of the State government despite having been notified as a cantonment.

After recording all their submissions, the Bench set aside the eviction proceedings initiated by the revenue authorities with liberty to the State government or any other authorities, having title over the property, to take appropriate proceedings as may be permissible under law.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.