Lok Sabha polls | Madras High Court junks plea to advance date of counting of votes in T.N.

The Court, while dismissing the writ petition that called for an earlier date for the counting of votes, said it could not interfere with the decision taken by the Election Commission of India

March 27, 2024 12:02 pm | Updated 07:57 pm IST - CHENNAI

A view of the Madras High Court.

A view of the Madras High Court. | Photo Credit: MOORTHY M

The Madras High Court on Wednesday dismissed a writ petition that sought to quash the Lok Sabha election notification issued for Tamil Nadu, fixing the date of polling as April 19, 2024 and the date of counting of votes as June 4, 2024.

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy rejected the plea made by the writ petitioner Ezhilan, to issue a consequential direction to advance the date of counting without the long gap of 45 days between polling and counting.

The petitioner’s counsel A. Rajini argued that providing such a long gap of 45 days was against the spirit of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which provides for the conduct of free and fair elections. She also claimed that it was arbitrary and illegal to delay the counting of votes.

However, when the Chief Justice wanted to know whether there was any provision in the 1951 Act that requires the Election Commission of India to count the votes within a specific period, the counsel accepted that there was no such provision in the Act.

After recording her submission, the judges wrote: “We do not find that the present petition espouses any public cause. It is more in the nature of a publicity interest litigation. The date of polling and counting has to be determined by only the Election Commission of India.”

Since the elections have to be conducted across the country, the Commission had decided to conduct it in seven phases beginning from April 19 to June 1 and then count the votes polled in all the seven phases on June 4. The courts could not interfere with such a decision taken by the ECI.

“It will not be within the domain of the High Court by exercising its powers under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction) of the Constitution to interfere with the election programme. Article 329 (bar to interference by courts into electoral matters) of the Constitution also would not permit to interfere with election programme,” the Bench said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.