Lok Sabha polls | ECI tells Madras High Court action will be taken based on police report on seizure of ₹3.99 crore from train passengers

The money was seized from three passengers on a train bound from Chennai to Tirunelveli on April 7; the T.N. police summoned BJP’s Tirunelveli candidate Nainar Nagendran for questioning in connection with this

April 18, 2024 03:07 pm | Updated April 19, 2024 06:45 am IST - CHENNAI

A view of the Madras High Court. File photograph

A view of the Madras High Court. File photograph

The Madras High Court on Thursday, April 18, 2024, recorded the submission of the Election Commission of India (ECI) that it would take further action on the seizure of ₹3.99 crore, from three passengers of a train bound to Tirunelveli from Chennai, after the police completes its investigation and files a final report.

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad also recorded the submission of ECI counsel Niranjan Rajagopalan that considering that amount of money, seized at the Tambaram railway station on April 7, was very large, the Income Tax Department too had been intimated about it.

The judges recorded the submissions and disposed of a writ petition filed by C.M. Raghavan, an independent candidate in the Tirunelveli Parliamentary constituency. The petitioner had insisted that the money belonged to BJP candidate Nainar Nagendran, and therefore, said that he must be disqualified.

Stating that another ₹28.5 lakh had been seized from DMK’s Tirunelveli East district secretary’s office on April 4 and that it was meant to bribe voters, the petitioner had insisted upon disqualifying Congress candidate C. Robert Bruce too, by considering a representation made by him to the ECI on April 7. It may be noted that the Congress is contesting in the DMK’s alliance in T.N., under the INDIA bloc.

The petitioner’s counsel A. Immanuel told the court that the election laws provide for disqualification of legislators who are elected through corrupt means and therefore, a direction must be issued to the ECI to take necessary action on the basis of the investigation into the seizures.

Though he also insisted on fixing a time limit for the ECI to take action on the basis of a representation made by the writ petitioner, the Chief Justice said it might not be appropriate to fix a time limit since the ECI would have to wait for the completion of the police investigation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.