Manipur row | Supreme Court to hear Hyderabad Professor’s plea on July 31

Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing is accused of promoting enmity, making false declarations, outraging religious feelings, among others, under the Indian Penal Code.

July 28, 2023 03:26 pm | Updated July 29, 2023 01:30 am IST - NEW DELHI

Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing.

Professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing. | Photo Credit: Twitter/@kksuanh

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear on July 31 a plea moved by a Hyderabad University professor and academic, Kham Khan Suan Hausing, to quash the summons issued and criminal proceedings initiated against him by a Manipur court shortly after his interview to a news portal.

Appearing before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, senior advocate Anand Grover and advocates Anju Thomas and Aastha Sharma sought an urgent listing of their plea to protect the personal liberty of the professor, who heads the Political Science department at the varsity and is considered an expert in northeastern States. They said the petition, which was originally listed before the Chief Justice of India’s court on July 28, could not be heard as the CJI was indisposed and did not hold court.

The petition said the Imphal East Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) had summoned Mr. Hausing to appear before his court on July 28 from Hyderabad. Mr. Hausing is accused of offences including promoting enmity, making false declarations, outraging religious feelings, among others, under the Indian Penal Code.

The petition said Mr. Hausing had not received copies of the complaint against him, the court order, trial court records, including statements of the complainant and witnesses.

It said the summons was issued despite the communal tension and disturbance in Manipur.

“Amidst the communal tension of the two communities, there is threat to his life and liberty… He is apprehensive that there is a real and imminent threat to his life if he travels to Manipur to answer the summons,” Mr. Hausing pleaded.

He narrated that on July 6, he was shocked to read on social media that an FIR has been registered against him on the basis of the media interview, pursuant to which the CJM, Imphal East, issued summons.

He said the Manipur court order which he had chanced upon in the social media was “incomplete”.

“The petitioner wrote to the authorities to supply the complaint/FIR, summons and trial record of the criminal complaint, but nothing has been forthcoming,” the petition said.

The professor has also urged the apex court to protect him from the baseless allegation that he is not a citizen of India.

“The allegation is ex-facie malicious as the petitioner was born on March 27, 1978, within the Indian demography and is entitled to citizenship by birth under Article 5(a) of the Constitution,” the petition clarified.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.