SC to pronounce verdict on the premature release of convicts in Bilkis Bano case

The arguments primarily focused on whether Gujarat had followed uniform standards while granting early remission to the 11 men

Updated - January 08, 2024 03:53 pm IST

Published - January 07, 2024 07:54 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Bilkis Bano. File

Bilkis Bano. File | Photo Credit: PTI

A Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna is scheduled on January 8 to pronounce its judgment on petitions challenging Gujarat government’s decision to prematurely release 11 men sentenced to life for the gang rape of Bilks Bano and murder of her family during the 2002 riots.

The Bench, also comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, had reserved the case for judgment in October 2023. The court had heard writ petitions separately filed by Ms. Bano and others, including Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Subhashini Ali and Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra.

Also Read: Bilkis Bano case | Supreme Court quashes Gujarat’s premature release of convicts

The arguments primarily focused on whether the State had followed uniform standards while granting early remission to the 11 men when murder convicts tend to otherwise languish in prison for years.

Ms. Bano’s lawyer, advocate Shobha Gupta, had submitted that the convicts did not deserve remission for the heinous nature of their crimes.

She had also challenged the jurisdiction of Gujarat, arguing that the trial happened in Maharashtra, and the State government there was the competent authority to decide on the issue of remission.

Opinion | Behind the release of Bilkis Bano’s tormentors 

Ms. Gupta had referred to Section 432(7)(b) which said the “appropriate government” would be the “State within which the offender is sentenced”.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, A.M. Singhvi and advocate Vrinda Grover, for the other petitioners, had argued that both the trial judge in Mumbai and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which was the prosecuting agency, had disagreed with the proposal to release the convicts. The Centre had however endorsed the early release.

Explained | How did the Bilkis Bano convicts walk free?  

Ms. Grover said the convicts were supposed to pay a fine of ₹34,000 or face 34 years in prison. “The fine has not been paid. That sentence was never served,” she had submitted.

The counsel for one of the convicts, advocate Rishi Malhotra, argued that Gujarat had decided the plea for early release on the basis of a Supreme Court judgment in May 2022.

This judgment had allowed the State of Gujarat to consider the pleas for early release under its Premature Release Policy of 1992. The apex court had earlier dismissed a plea to review the May 2022 judgment.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.