Prophet remarks row: No coercive action against Nupur Sharma, says Supreme Court

Nupur’s lawyer alleged a continuing threat to her life in the case

July 19, 2022 04:31 pm | Updated 08:14 pm IST - New Delhi:

Supreme Court on Tuesday granted suspended BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma protection from coercive action in connection with FIRs/complaints filed against her in several States over her remarks on the Prophet made during a television debate show. File.

Supreme Court on Tuesday granted suspended BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma protection from coercive action in connection with FIRs/complaints filed against her in several States over her remarks on the Prophet made during a television debate show. File. | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court on Tuesday protected former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma from any coercive action in multiple FIRs registered in various parts of the country following her televised remarks about Prophet Muhammed.

Appearing before a Bench of Justices Surya Kant and J. B. Pardiwala, Ms. Sharma’s lawyer said there is a continuing threat to her life.

She said more FIRs were registered against her immediately after the same judges, sitting as a Vacation Bench, had declined her plea for protection on July 1.

On Tuesday, Ms. Sharma was able to convince Justices Kant and Pardiwala, who assembled specially at 3 p.m. to hear her case.

This time, the Bench issued notice on her plea to either quash all the cases against her or, in the alternative, transfer them from various States to Delhi in order to safeguard her right against multiple prosecution for the same offence. The Bench has sought responses from the States of West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Maharashtra and Telangana in this regard by August 10.

“Meanwhile, as an interim measure, it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner (Sharma) pursuant to the impugned FIR(s)/complaint(s) or FIR(s)/complaint(s) which may be registered/entertained in the future pertaining to the telecast,” the court directed.

During the hearing, senior advocate Maninder Singh, for Ms. Sharma, said it has become impossible to follow the apex court’s advice of July 1 to approach the High Courts for relief. He said more and more cases have been filed since then. An FIR has been filed in West Bengal and a look-out circular was issued against her on July 2. She may be arrested any moment and consequently denied an opportunity to approach different High Courts seeking quashing of the FIRs against her. 

Mr. Singh said it would not be possible for Ms. Sharma to approach each and every one of the High Court for relief when there was a death threat hanging over her head. “One Salman Chisti claiming to be a Khadim of Ajmer Dargahhas circulated a video whereby in a very disturbing manner he has called upon for cutting the throat of the applicant/petitioner; one more person, Nasir, resident of Uttar Pradesh, has made a viral video using abusive language against the petitioner and threatened to behead her,” the court recorded Mr. Singh’s averments.

“There is a real threat to her life. There were reports of someone travelling from Pakistan to kill her. Some persons were apprehended in Patna,” Mr. Singh submitted.

He said there was an “imminent necessity” to protect her life and liberty as guaranteed under Article 21.

On July 1, the court had come down heavily on Ms. Sharma for her remarks, saying she was single-handedly responsible for the ensuing protests and should have apologised to the nation.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.