Mining without forest clearances in Odisha branded ‘illegal’ by SC

The Supreme Court was irked that mining companies, which have not been granted forest clearances by the Centre and other authorities, are continuing with the “illegal excavation” of minerals in Odisha

June 06, 2022 01:42 pm | Updated 01:42 pm IST - New Delhi

An active iron ore mine at Joda-Barbil area of Keonjhar district, Odisha

An active iron ore mine at Joda-Barbil area of Keonjhar district, Odisha | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Monday took strong note of continuing “illegal mining” of minerals by some firms in Odisha without obtaining forest clearance (FCs) from authorities under the garb of “status quo” orders, and asked the state High Court to dispose of such matters in six months.

The top court was irked over the fact that the mining companies, which have not been granted FCs by the Centre and other authorities, are continuing with the “illegal excavation” of minerals on grounds that the High Court has passed the status quo orders with regard to the dispute.

“How can the mining be continued without getting forest clearance (from authorities) under the garb of a status quo order from the High Court,” a vacation bench of justices M. R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose said.

“Anything which has been excavated without the forest clearance is illegal. You cannot be permitted to continue with the excavation or extraction of minerals without the forest clearance. It is unfortunate that High Courts are passing such orders of status quo and permitting continuance of mining work,” the bench said.

No clearance, no mining

The bench, which was hearing the appeal of M/s Balasore Alloys Ltd of Odisha against the High Court’s refusal to continue with the status quo order favouring the firm, permitted the company to withdraw its plea.

It said that it would permit the withdrawal but the company cannot be allowed to mine as it does not “have the forest clearance to mine as on today and hence, this is illegal and cannot be done. “

“We have heard the... counsel. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is not having the forest clearance at this stage. Merely because the application for forest clearance is pending cannot be treated as having obtained the forest clearance permitting the petitioner to carry on the mining activities,” it said.

“Before parting with the present order, we request, the (Orissa) High Court to decide and dispose of all such pending matters, where the order of status quo is continuing since long and the mining activities have been continued under the order of status quo, within a period of six months from today without fail. With this the present SLP is dismissed as withdrawn,” it ordered.

It directed the apex court’s registry to communicate the order to the chief justice of the High Court forthwith for necessary action.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.