Impose lockdown in Gujarat to curb COVID-19 spread: IMA tells HC

"The government should completely ban all kind of gatherings.”

April 20, 2021 05:33 pm | Updated 05:33 pm IST - Ahmedabad

Covid-19 patients watch a movie at a COVID Care Centre in Surat, on April 19, 2021.

Covid-19 patients watch a movie at a COVID Care Centre in Surat, on April 19, 2021.

The Gujarat government should impose a two-week lockdown in the state to check the spread of COVID-19, the IMA's state branch suggested in its submission to the Gujarat High Court on Tuesday.

If the state government is not in favour of a lockdown, then it should think of restricting various activities to control people's movement outside their homes, the Indian Medical Association's (IMA) Gujarat chapter president Dr. Devendra Patel told the HC.

Also read | High Court concerned over Gujarat government’s COVID-19 management

He made the suggestions before a division bench of Chief Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Bhargav Karia during an online hearing on a PIL taken up suo motu (on its own) on the overall coronavirus situation in the state.

The bench had invited Dr. Patel to share his views on behalf of doctors.

Around 30,000 doctors from Gujarat are members of the IMA's state branch.

"The government should completely ban all kind of gatherings, be it social, political or religious. If possible, the government should impose a total lockdown for 14 days. If it is not possible, then put severe restrictions on activities," Dr. Patel told the bench.

Also read | Gujarat government not in favour of lockdown: CM Vijay Rupani

He also suggested that the government should come up with a centralised system displaying availability of beds (for COVID-19 patients) in the state, saying "people are rushing from one hospital to another for beds".

Responding to the suggestions, government pleader Manisha Shah said taking a decision about imposing a lockdown is akin to "walking on the edge of sword".

She said the state government was committed to save both "lives and livelihood".

The bench posted the PIL for further hearing on April 27.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.