Hardik Patel denied bail in sedition case by Surat court

He is behind bars in a sedition case for allegedly inciting a fellow activist to kill policemen instead of committing suicide.

December 10, 2015 03:35 pm | Updated September 02, 2016 11:14 am IST - Surat

The bail plea of Patel quota agitation leader Hardik Patel was rejected on Thursday by a district and sessions court here. He is behind bars in a sedition case for > allegedly inciting a fellow activist to kill policemen instead of committing suicide.

Principal District Judge Geeta Gopi dismissed the bail plea of the 22-year-old firebrand leader, who spearheaded the agitation demanding reservation for the Patel community under the OBC category.

Two sedition complaints were filed against Hardik, the first one in Surat and another in Ahmedabad.

On November 16, Hardik, who is lodged in Lajpore jail here, moved his bail plea before the sessions court, claiming that he was booked under false charges, as mere spoken words do not amount to sedition.

The plea said the state government deliberately slapped false charges on him to keep him away from the recently-held local body polls across the state.

The Surat police had arrested Hardik in October on charges of sedition for allegedly inciting a fellow activist Vipul Desai ‘to kill policemen instead of committing suicide’.

Later, Ahmedabad crime branch also invoked sedition charge against him through a separate FIR filed on October 21 for allegedly inciting Patel youths to resort to violence in order to destabilise the state government.

During the arguments on December 7, the Surat city police had opposed bail to Hardik, claiming that he may tamper with evidence if released on bail when the investigation is still on against him.

The prosecution also argued that there is high possibility that Hardik will not cooperate in investigation once released on bail.

Hardik has also filed a bail plea before an Ahmedabad court in the second sedition case filed against him, where the order is likely to be pronounced tomorrow.

In the second case filed in Ahmedabad, the Gujarat High Court had recently dropped IPC sections 121 — pertaining to waging war against the government, 153(A) — promoting enmity between different communities and 153 (B) — assertions prejudicial to national integrity, on the FIR against Hardik while retaining the charge of sedition.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.