Don’t pursue probe against Army officer, SC tells J&K government

March 06, 2018 12:47 am | Updated March 07, 2018 03:46 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The Supreme Court on Monday ordered the Jammu and Kashmir government not to pursue any investigation against Major Aditya Kumar in connection with the killing of three persons after Army personnel allegedly opened fire on protesters in Shopian district.

Attorney-General K.K. Venugopal said the State should not have filed an FIR against Major Kumar without taking prior sanction from the Centre.

The Centre agreed with the Army officer’s father that such criminal action demoralised soldiers fighting for the country.

The Mehbooba Mufti government said Major Kumar was not named as an accused in the FIR, but only mentioned as the officer leading the convoy. Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, leading a three-judge Bench, was not convinced by the State’s explanation.

“There is no allegation against him in the FIR. The proceedings is infructuous,” the State government, represented by senior advocate Shekhar Naphade, submitted

“But he can be roped in any time... Do not proceed against him. He is an Army officer and not just a common criminal,” Chief Justice Misra addressed.

To this, Mr. Naphade replied that “soldiers do not have a licence to kill”. He said there were responsible police officers involved in the case and they “knew the difference” between the guilty and the innocent.

Incensed by the State's remarks, Mr. Venugopal intervened to ask “a licence to kill? Many soldiers have been killed there... that is not something?”

When one of the petitioners submitted that cases against stone-pelters are being withdrawn, the Supreme Court said those matters were still with the Magistrate concerned.

Lt. Colonel Karamveer Singh, Major Kumar’s father and himself a serving Army officer, had argued that the State should have instead registered an FIR against the mob who attacked the convoy and allegedly tried to lynch a Junior Commissioned Officer. Mr. Singh said the mob attack on the Army personnel amounted to “terrorist activity”.

Mr. Singh, a Kargil War veteran, asked the apex court to issue guidelines to protect the dignity of soldiers acting in the line of duty.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.