Another accused declared as adult in Kathua case

Pathankot court accepts medical report, won’t consider Parvesh Kumar a juvenile

Updated - July 06, 2018 10:48 pm IST

Published - July 06, 2018 02:15 am IST - Pathankot

Parvesh Kumar, accused in the Kathua rape-and-murder case, being produced before a court in Pathankot.

Parvesh Kumar, accused in the Kathua rape-and-murder case, being produced before a court in Pathankot.

The Pathankot district and sessions court has accepted a medical report determining an accused in the Kathua rape-and-murder case, who claimed to be a juvenile, as being more than 20 years of age, said special public prosecutor J.K. Chopra.

Rejecting the plea of defence counsel, district and sessions judge Tajwinder Singh said the accused, Parvesh Kumar alias ‘Mannu’, will be treated as an adult, the lawyer said.

Mr. Chopra said the court has declined his application and declared the accused as a ‘major’.

To challenge verdict

Kumar’s counsel A.K. Sawhney told reporters outside the court that they would be challenging the verdict of the trial court in the Supreme Court soon.

The medical report was submitted before the court earlier this week by the Jammu and Kashmir police’s Crime Branch after it resumed post summer break.

The district and sessions judge had issued directions to the Crime Branch to conduct a bone ossification test to ascertain the age of Kumar, one of the eight accused in the brutal rape-and-murder case of an eight-year-old nomadic girl in Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir in January.

Asked what was the opinion of the doctors about the age of the accused, Mr. Chopra said, “According to it (the medical opinion), his age is stated to be 20 plus.”

Another juvenile’s case

The fate of another accused, who has claimed to be a juvenile, is yet to be decided as the matter was pending before the Jammu and Kashmir High Court after the Crime Branch moved an application urging him to be treated as an adult based on his medical reports.

The court had ordered the test after the defence counsel moved an application in the first week of June, requesting to treat him as a minor citing his matriculation certificate.

The Crime Branch had constituted a team of doctors, comprising medicos from various streams including the radiology department, and the accused was examined on June 22 and 23.

The court had directed Senior Superintendent of Police R.K. Jalla to supervise the medical examination and submit the report when the court reopens after a 16-day summer break.

While seven of the accused, including Kumar, are facing trial in the court here on the directions of the Supreme Court, the eighth accused in the case is facing trial in a juvenile court in Kathua district.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.