Poll cheer: pension in the works

Updated - March 24, 2016 08:29 pm IST

Published - October 22, 2015 12:00 am IST

Former civic representatives of the State, around an estimated 40,000 of them, may get a pension in their sunset years from the local bodies that they had served, if the State government finally clears a proposal which is hanging fire.

The recommendations of a high-level committee, which suggested a minimum monthly pension of Rs.3,000, are under government consideration. The Cabinet would have the final say, sources said.

The committee wants those in the 50-plus age group, who have put in a complete five-year term and have not been re-elected, to be considered for the support.

Those who have taken up any remunerative job after the expiry of their term in local bodies will not be eligible for the pension.

The committee is understood to have suggested that the local bodies should foot the pension bill and spare the State government of the financial burden.

If the government gives its nod, the pension may become a reality during the term of the newly elected local bodies, which will assume office on December 1. The pension scheme would possibly have retrospective effect too, the sources added.

The representatives have been, since long, demanding pension, a hike in honoraria and other benefits from the State government. Several local bodies had passed resolutions urging the government to introduce welfare schemes as a large number of former local bodies’ representatives were left struggling to survive.

It is estimated that around 22,000 local bodies’ representatives would be sworn-in this year in as many as 88 municipalities, six Corporations, 156 block panchayats, and 970 village panchayats. In 2010, there were 21,000 representatives in the three-tier panchayat raj institutions. The number of representatives was estimated to be 18,000 in 2005.

C.P. John, a member of the Planning Board, said no formal discussions had yet been held in the ruling United Democratic Front (UDF) about the pension issue. A cut-off age for eligibility was certainly required as people as young as 21 years are getting elected these days, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.