Congress on the back foot as court rejects Kuzhalnadan’s plea for anti-corruption probe against Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan

Court reportedly finds some merit in VACB argument that litigation seemed politically motivated. Verdict also prompts CPI(M) to open new line of attack against Congress

May 06, 2024 07:40 pm | Updated May 07, 2024 11:23 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Mathew Kuzhalnadan (file)

Mathew Kuzhalnadan (file)

The Congress seemed to have suffered a political and legal setback in some measure after an anti-corruption court here found little merit in party legislator Mathew Kuzhalnadan’s accusation that Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and his daughter, T. Veena, had illegally benefited from the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government’s “mining lease concessions“ to a Kochi-based mining firm in 2016.

Mr. Kuzhalnadan had initially approached the Special Vigilance Court here, saying the Vigilance department had refused to probe financial transactions between Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd. (CMRL) and Ms. Veena's company Exalogic.

The court summarily threw out Mr. Kuzhalnadan’s plea for a court-monitored vigilance investigation into his claim that the mining company had contracted Ms. Veena’s IT consultancy for a sizeable monthly retainer as a quid pro quo for the government’s nod for acquiring “excess land“ to quarry for rare minerals in Alappuzha district in contravention of Central government norms.

Mr. Kuzhalnadan’s accusations of nepotism and corruption dominated television talk shows, significantly impacting the political narrative and offering the Congress a sensational grist to target Mr. Vijayan, the LDF’s star campaigner, during the protracted Lok Sabha campaign phase. 

‘Politically motivated’

The court reportedly found some merit in the VACB’s argument that the litigation seemed politically motivated.

Mr. Kuzhalnadan’s plea had its provenance in an I-T Tribunal’s contentious finding that the mining firm had made several “inexplicable“ payments to politicians, their next of kin, and some media houses between 2017 and 2021. 

The controversy also had the makings of a private spat, with Mr. Kuzhalnadan portraying a “land grab“ case registered against him in Idukki as a political vendetta pursued zealously by Mr. Vijayan’s office. 

The arguably damning court verdict seemed to have brought the Congress’s accusatory campaign against Mr. Vijayan to a screeching halt, at least temporarily. Mr. Kuzhalnadan said he would appeal against the court’s finding if required.

The verdict also prompted the CPI(M) to open a new line of attack against the Congress. The party’s State secretariat said the verdict had laid bare the “Congress-right wing media-Central government“ conspiracy to defame the Chief Minister and the CPI(M) by weaving a politically motivated yarn spun from malicious lies and far-fetched conspiracy theories in the run-up to the Lok Sabha polls. 

Union Minister of State For External Affairs V. Muraleedharan, said the Congress had compromised on principles and withheld evidence to save Mr. Vijayan, an INDIA Bloc ally, from political and legal jeopardy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.