Reducing fossil fuel emissions might have greater climate benefits than afforestation: IISc study 

Updated - July 18, 2023 07:00 am IST - Bengaluru

The duo in this paper compared the climate and carbon cycle consequences of carbon removal by afforestation.

The duo in this paper compared the climate and carbon cycle consequences of carbon removal by afforestation. | Photo Credit: File Photo

A study by the Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences in the Indian Institute of Science has revealed that reducing fossil fuel emissions might have greater climate benefits than afforestation.

The study, “A comparison of the climate and carbon cycle effects of carbon removal by afforestation and an equivalent reduction in fossil fuel emissions” was conducted by Koramanghat Unnikrishnan Jayakrishnan and Govindasamy Bala at the Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.

The duo in this paper compared the climate and carbon cycle consequences of carbon removal by afforestation, and an equivalent fossil fuel emission reduction using simulations from an intermediate complexity Earth system model.

“We performed two major sets of idealised simulations in which fossil fuel emissions follow extended Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios (SSP2-4.5, 3-7.0, and 5-8.5), and equal amounts of carbon are removed by afforestation in one set and by a reduction in fossil fuel emissions in another set,” states the abstract paper of the study.

How systems compare

It added that their simulations show that the climate is cooler by 0.36, 0.47, and 0.42 ∘C in the long term (2471 to 2500) in the case of reduced fossil fuel emissions compared to the case with afforestation when the emissions follow the SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, respectively.

“This disparity arises because afforestation, while effective at carbon removal, also introduces biophysical changes on the Earth’s surface, such as decreased reflectivity for sunlight and increased evapotranspiration, which together partly offset the cooling effect from carbon removal. In contrast, reducing fossil fuel emissions alone focuses on just preventing carbon dioxide release from fossil fuels, thereby reducing greenhouse gas concentrations without directly altering the land cover or vegetation,” IISc said.

The study further states that in terms of climate benefits, reducing fossil fuel emissions could be relatively more beneficial than afforestation for the same amount of carbon removed from the atmosphere. “However, a robust understanding of the processes that govern the biophysical effects of afforestation should be improved before considering our results for climate policy,” it said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.