Notice to Karnataka Government on PIL against survey of churches

Updated - October 27, 2021 02:36 pm IST

Published - October 26, 2021 02:15 am IST - Bengaluru

 A division bench of the High Court of Karnataka  comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum passed the order on a petition filed by People’s Union for Civil Liberties-Karnataka.

A division bench of the High Court of Karnataka comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum passed the order on a petition filed by People’s Union for Civil Liberties-Karnataka.

The High Court of Karnataka on Monday ordered issue of notice to the State Government on a PIL petition questioning the legality of the July 7, 2021, communication issued by the Directorate of Minorities Welfare to Deputy Commissioners to conduct a survey of churches in their districts for data collection purposes.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum passed the order on the petition filed by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties-Karnataka.

The petitioner contended that the communication, issued based on a meeting of the Welfare Committee held on July 7, “is illegal, discriminatory, arbitrary and unconstitutional, being violative of the right to equality and privacy under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.”

Even the Karnataka Minorities Commission Act, 1994, has no provision that empowers the collection of such data about churches, the petitioner contented, pointing out that the communication was discriminatory as it singled out churches while not including other religious or religious minority institutions.

Pointing out that the directorate had sought details such as taluk, district, and Assembly constituency-wise location of churches, their nam es, address, property type and property khata details, and the names of the pastor/father, the petitioner claimed that the communication was silent on the purpose of collection of data, its storage, use and accessibility.

Senior counsel Ravivarma Kumar, appearing for the petitioner, contended that the survey of churches amounted to “persecution” of minority institutions. He claimed that the survey was intrusive and seriously infringed on the fundamental right to privacy of a religious minority community.

However, the Bench orally told him that the petitioner had not produced any material on re cord to show that the survey of churches amounted to persecution of Christians. When the senior counsel sought an interim order to “protect churches from being persecuted”, the Bench said it would consider passing any order after receiving the Govern ment’s response.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.